2021
DOI: 10.15587/2523-4153.2021.235118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and legal characteristics of problem aspects of free secondary legal aid and prospects of their solution

Abstract: The article analyzes problems of providing free secondary legal aid in Ukraine. Based on the studied statistical indicators, it is determined, that the most unresolved issues are the availability and quality of legal aid. It is stated, that in order to overcome these obstacles, the state, represented by the authorized bodies, cooperates with many international organizations, participates in international technical assistance projects and provides communication with international and national public organizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be admitted that to date, there is no convincing evidence that under the control of the UNBA, the FSLA system will be better administered than under the leadership of the CC. In fact, this is only an assumption, because numerous and systemic corporate problems identified by authoritative international institutions (CCBE follow-up report on Ukraine, 2014, p. 6-8; Ukraina: konflikt, pozbavlennia prava zaimatysia advokatskoiu diialnistiu ta zupynennia dii litsenzii na zdiisnennia advokatskoi diialnosti, 2014, p. 7, 9-10, 13-14, 16-20; Report on the CCBE fact-finding mission to Kiev, 2013, p. 3,5,9,11,[13][14] remain unresolved in the system of bodies of the advocate's self-government. In the professional community, there are views that the transfer of the function of distributing assignments between advocates to provide FSLA to the bar authorities will lead to nepotism, abuse and other voluntary actions, because it is becoming easier to control a government official than an elected representative of the advocate's selfgovernment (Ivanytskyi, 2017, p. 392).…”
Section: Subject Of Administration Of the System Of Free Secondary Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be admitted that to date, there is no convincing evidence that under the control of the UNBA, the FSLA system will be better administered than under the leadership of the CC. In fact, this is only an assumption, because numerous and systemic corporate problems identified by authoritative international institutions (CCBE follow-up report on Ukraine, 2014, p. 6-8; Ukraina: konflikt, pozbavlennia prava zaimatysia advokatskoiu diialnistiu ta zupynennia dii litsenzii na zdiisnennia advokatskoi diialnosti, 2014, p. 7, 9-10, 13-14, 16-20; Report on the CCBE fact-finding mission to Kiev, 2013, p. 3,5,9,11,[13][14] remain unresolved in the system of bodies of the advocate's self-government. In the professional community, there are views that the transfer of the function of distributing assignments between advocates to provide FSLA to the bar authorities will lead to nepotism, abuse and other voluntary actions, because it is becoming easier to control a government official than an elected representative of the advocate's selfgovernment (Ivanytskyi, 2017, p. 392).…”
Section: Subject Of Administration Of the System Of Free Secondary Le...mentioning
confidence: 99%