2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61804-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical insights into excited-state hydrogen bonding effects and intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) mechanism for BTS system

Abstract: In this work, N,N'-bis(salicylidene)-(2-(3′,4′-diaminophenyl)benzothiazole) (named as "BtS") system was studied about its excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (eSipt) process. the analyses about reduced density gradient (RDG) reveal the formation of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds in BtS system. Bond lengths and angles, infrared (IR) vibrations as well as frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) using tDDft method indicate that the strength of hydrogen bond should be enhanced in the S 1 state. Particularly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plausible route for the formation of α-hydroxy-1,2-diketone 14a is presented in Scheme 4 . Based on literature data we suppose that the photoreaction proceeds through an excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) [ 34 36 ]. At first, compound 12a under UV irradiation undergoes rapid proton transfer from the excited state A* resulting in the formation of photoisomer B* followed by the conversion to intermediate C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plausible route for the formation of α-hydroxy-1,2-diketone 14a is presented in Scheme 4 . Based on literature data we suppose that the photoreaction proceeds through an excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) [ 34 36 ]. At first, compound 12a under UV irradiation undergoes rapid proton transfer from the excited state A* resulting in the formation of photoisomer B* followed by the conversion to intermediate C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might also be considered a lower-cost computational option for large polyatomic molecules as this protocol, compared to the dynamic ones, usually involves a relatively limited number of demanding energy-gradient calculations and facilitates further savings by allowing calculations under fixed system symmetry, if such is present. Typical outcomes of the static approach are absorption and emission vertical electronic energies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], upper-bound estimations for possible energy barriers in the ground and electronically excited states [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], and detailed characterization of these states in terms of symmetry and orbital configuration [ 38 , 39 ]. Moreover, the number of other molecular features complementing the experimental ESIPT characterization can be determined, including, e.g., tautomers relative energies [ 35 , 40 ], atomic charges [ 41 , 42 , 43 ], and vibrational modes attribution [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Static Investigation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, again one needs to make a compromise between the computational cost and desired accuracy. Most common recent choices in ESIPT studies seem to be favoring the cc-pVTZ [ 91 ] basis set from the Dunning family on the one hand [ 3 , 33 , 39 , 40 , 48 ], and different variants of the Pople 6-311 G(d,p) [ 92 ] basis set, on the other [ 36 , 72 , 73 ]. The latter direction finds its support in a general study by Laurent et al [ 93 ], in which the basis-set effect on vertical excitation energy calculations was investigated.…”
Section: Static Investigation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most remarkable photophysical property of the ESIPT chromophores is the large fluorescence Stokes shift. The presence of this property in compounds showing ESIPT phenomena, together with the dual emission makes them quite exploited as OLED materials, spectroscopy tools, and fluorescence probes in biology [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. However, the ESIPT process in 2-acetyl-1-naphthol has been in controversy for long, primarily because of its quantitative ESIPT conversion in most solution conditions and also due to small Stokes shift of the ESIPT products (keto type prototautomer) compared to those products in other typical ESIPT molecules [ 1 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%