2004
DOI: 10.1021/jp048253s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Survey of the Potential Energy Surfaces Associated with the N+(3P,D) + C2H4Reactions in the Gas Phase

Abstract: The potential energy surfaces (PESs) associated with the reactions between ethylene and N+(3P,1D) ions have been investigated through the use of high-level G2(MP2) ab initio calculations. Although the N+(3P) + C2H4 entrance channel lies 46.7 kcal mol-1 below the N+(1D) + C2H4, most of the singlet-state cations are more stable than their triplet-state counterparts because, in general, the bonds in the former are stronger than those in the latter, favoring the crossover between both PESs. Several minimum energy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are rationalized with the two‐state 25–27 or multistate (MS) 28 reactivity concepts, where the crossing of two or more spin states produces the spin flipping necessary to reach the final products and which can provide lower energy reaction paths for otherwise too high‐activation channels. This scenario is usually found in organometallic chemistry 29–33, because the partially occupied d shell of transition metals facilitates the appearance of different spin states of close energy, but it is applicable to many spin‐forbidden reactions 34–36.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are rationalized with the two‐state 25–27 or multistate (MS) 28 reactivity concepts, where the crossing of two or more spin states produces the spin flipping necessary to reach the final products and which can provide lower energy reaction paths for otherwise too high‐activation channels. This scenario is usually found in organometallic chemistry 29–33, because the partially occupied d shell of transition metals facilitates the appearance of different spin states of close energy, but it is applicable to many spin‐forbidden reactions 34–36.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%