2003
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617703910010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretically derived CVLT subtypes in HIV-1 infection: Internal and external validation

Abstract: The present study sought to delineate empirically derived memory subtypes using the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis et al., 1987) in a sample of adults with HIV-1 infection (N 5 154). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate eight models of the CVLT structure suggested by Wiegner and Donders (1999). A four-factor model, consisting of Attention Span, Learning Efficiency, Delayed Recall, and Inaccurate Recall appeared to be the best fitting model. Variables with the highest factor loadings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(111 reference statements)
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this interpretation, the HIV-1 group performed comparably to the HC sample on the recognition task, which indicates that reducing the self-initiated retrieval demands of the task allowed the HIV-1 group to more effectively identify the correct intention and cue. This pattern of ProM retrieval difficulties is consistent with the episodic learning and retrieval profile that has been consistently identified in HIV-1 disease on traditional retrospective recall tasks (e.g., Murji et al, 2003). Specifically, persons with HIV-1 often exhibit dysfunction in the strategic or "executive" aspects of both retrospective and prospective episodic memory tasks, but not in consolidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In support of this interpretation, the HIV-1 group performed comparably to the HC sample on the recognition task, which indicates that reducing the self-initiated retrieval demands of the task allowed the HIV-1 group to more effectively identify the correct intention and cue. This pattern of ProM retrieval difficulties is consistent with the episodic learning and retrieval profile that has been consistently identified in HIV-1 disease on traditional retrospective recall tasks (e.g., Murji et al, 2003). Specifically, persons with HIV-1 often exhibit dysfunction in the strategic or "executive" aspects of both retrospective and prospective episodic memory tasks, but not in consolidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…By way of comparison, retention (i.e., consolidation) and recognition discrimination are less commonly affected in persons with HIV-1 disease (e.g., Delis et al, 1995). Taken together, the memory profile of HIV-1-infection is most consistent with dysfunction in the strategic (i.e., executive) aspects of encoding and retrieval as seen in prototypical "subcortical" disorders, such as Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases (e.g., Massman, Delis, Butters, Levin, & Salmon, 1990;Murji et al, 2003). To date, however, the scope of episodic memory research in HIV-1 disease has been limited to studies of retrospective memory (i.e., memory for past events and experiences).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Episodic memory impairment is evident in approximately 50% of individuals infected with HIV (e.g., Heaton et al, 1995) and is typically characterized by deficits in higher-level encoding (e.g., Murji, Rourke, Donders, Carter, Shore, & Rourke, 2003) and retrieval (e.g., Delis et al, 1994) strategies. Whilst the literature demonstrates a clear link between HIV-associated episodic memory impairment and IADL declines, such research has been limited to the construct of retrospective memory (RetM); that is, the recollection of past events in response to an explicit prompt (e.g., recalling a physician's specific instructions regarding medication usage upon being asked), which is the putative ability measured by most standard clinical tests of memory (e.g., list learning and recall).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%