The main objective of this study was to use structural equation modeling (SEM) to clarify the relationship between subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychological functioning in 160 adults with HIV infection. Participants completed questionnaires assessing cognitive complaints, symptoms of depression, and HIV-related medical symptoms. Neuropsychological tests included measures of attention, verbal fluency, psychomotor skills, learning, memory, and executive skills. SEM was used to test models of the relationships among cognitive complaints, mood, and medical symptoms with neuropsychological functioning. The model indicated that although depressed mood ( ϭ 0.32, p Ͻ .01) and medical symptoms ( ϭ 0.31, p Ͻ .01) influenced cognitive complaints, cognitive complaints were independently associated with poorer neuropsychological performance ( ϭ 0.39, p Ͻ .01). Mood and medical symptoms were significantly correlated but were not significantly associated with neuropsychological skills.
The present study sought to delineate empirically derived memory subtypes using the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis et al., 1987) in a sample of adults with HIV-1 infection (N 5 154). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate eight models of the CVLT structure suggested by Wiegner and Donders (1999). A four-factor model, consisting of Attention Span, Learning Efficiency, Delayed Recall, and Inaccurate Recall appeared to be the best fitting model. Variables with the highest factor loadings from the model were entered in a two-stage cluster analysis. Four reliable CVLT clusters or subtypes were identified: Normal, Atypical, Subsyndromal, and Frontal-striatal. Internal and external validation of subtypes demonstrated that clusters were stable and clinically interpretable. Subtypes were meaningfully related to neuropsychological functioning, and to some extent, depressive symptomatology. Subtypes did not differ significantly with respect to subjective neurocognitive complaints and markers of HIV-1 disease. The present findings highlight the heterogeneity of memory profiles in HIV-1 infection and support a frontal-striatal conceptualization of verbal memory performance. The identification of robust HIV-1 memory subtypes may have important implications for the clinical management of adults infected with HIV-1 infection. (JINS, 2003, 9, 1-16.)
Using neuropsychological evidence, this paper examines whether spatial attention functions as a domain-specific module or as a more general-purpose central processor. Data are presented from two spatial attention cuing tasks completed by subjects, with an acquired attentional deficit, and control subjects. In both tasks, an arrow indicated with high probability the side of response (response task) or the side of space on which the stimulus would appear (visuospatial task). In the response task, the stimuli appeared foveally and the response component was lateralized, and in the visuospatial task, the stimuli were lateralized and the response component remained constant in the midline. Only the neglect subjects showed a disproportionate increase in reaction time on both the response and visuospatial tasks when the arrow cued the subject to the ipsilateral side and the stimulus or response was on the side of space contralateral to the lesion. The substantial association across the two tasks suggests that a common underlying internal spatial representation subserves perception and action. While this finding is consistent with Fodor's view of a cross-domain processor, it does not meet all of his criteria of a central processor. We conclude, therefore, that the posterior attentional mechanism is strictly neither a module nor a central processor. Rather, these results suggest that a common attentional mechanism may subserve behavior in domains that are tightly coupled.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.