Grammatik Aus Nähe Und Distanz 2006
DOI: 10.1515/9783110944709.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorie des Nähe- und Distanzsprechens

Abstract: Bibliografische Information der Deutschen BibliothekDie Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dürscheid 2003;Ágel/Hennig 2006bÁgel/Hennig , 2007. Dürscheid 2003;Ágel/Hennig 2006bÁgel/Hennig , 2007.…”
Section: _____________unclassified
“…Dürscheid 2003;Ágel/Hennig 2006bÁgel/Hennig , 2007. Dürscheid 2003;Ágel/Hennig 2006bÁgel/Hennig , 2007.…”
Section: _____________unclassified
“…Self-reformulations are a typical sign of conceptional orality as opposed to conceptional distance (Koch and Oesterreicher, 1985; Ágel and Hennig, 2006; 2007). Orality and distance in this sense are conceived as conceptionally ‘oral’ or conceptionally ‘written’ genres or discourse traditions ( code parlé/code écrit ; Söll, 1974) constituted by a number of extra-linguistic communicative conditions.…”
Section: Introduction: Conceptional Orality and Conceptional Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Koch and Oesterreicher model was revised by Ágel and Hennig (2006; 2007) in recent years. Aiming at a more precise definition and operationalization of communicative conditions and verbalization strategies, the authors propose five levels of discourse hierarchy, which are described along the five parameters of communicative role, time, situation, code and modality.…”
Section: Introduction: Conceptional Orality and Conceptional Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…hierzu Consten/Schwarz-Friesel (2007: 272f. (Eisenberg 2006: 171) Aber während für die Spezifikation der Bedeutung eines anaphorischen Elements "keine außersprachliche, situationsimmanente Zeighilfe wie Gesten usw. vonnöten ist" (Harweg 1979: 43) (Ágel/Hennig 2006: 57, vgl. auch Bühler 1934 In Anlehnung an die Ausführungen in der IDS-Grammatik (1997: 311 bzw.…”
Section: Liest Man Desunclassified