2017
DOI: 10.11141/ia.44.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorising 3D Visualisation Systems in Archaeology: Towards more effective design, evaluations and life cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our recent project specifically focussed on sound's effect in virtual exhibition environments, building on our previous studies aimed at understanding how new technologies effect perception and our understanding of heritage [15]- [17]. Our initial results are highly promising, demonstrating that soundscapes can significantly boost engagement with virtually exhibited objects whenever such soundscapes are tailored to the specific objects in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our recent project specifically focussed on sound's effect in virtual exhibition environments, building on our previous studies aimed at understanding how new technologies effect perception and our understanding of heritage [15]- [17]. Our initial results are highly promising, demonstrating that soundscapes can significantly boost engagement with virtually exhibited objects whenever such soundscapes are tailored to the specific objects in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regarding the design of a 3D visualisation supported by a web-based platform, Boutsi, Ioannidis, and Soile (2019) suggested focusing on: the graphics user interface (GUI), dynamic multimedia annotation, dynamic rotation of camera movement and clickable labels. Galeazzi & Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco (2017) pointed out humanobject interaction is an important aspect of 3D visualisation and argued we should link various datasets and provide suitable, useful access to researchers and practitioners. Alliez et al (2017) however, recommend providing the full data resolution of the 3D model, dynamic lighting, measuring features, non-photorealistic lighting, cut-through sections, maps and sections from the 3D model, a dynamic camera, volume calculation at different layers, exploded views, space wrapping for enhanced visibility and inspection, including an option for transparent rendering.…”
Section: Repositoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of digital heritage infrastructures have emerged, providing an improved user experience for those visiting museums, exhibitions, archaeological sites, and various cultural places/sites. More sophisticated computer applications are emerging to support the modern demands of digital preservation, documentation, and dissemination of heritage artefacts and sites (Galeazzi & Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco, 2017). And increasingly powerful, accessible and useful 3D modelling and multimedia software (Pavlidis, Koutsoudis, Arnaoutoglou, Tsioukas, & Chamzas, 2007) has inspired a variety of hobbyist and community-generated 3D assets, available in flexible new formats with links to social media platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As digital technologies developed, and the equipment capable of creating photo-realistic representations of archaeological sites and artifacts began to be used by archaeologists, a new avenue of instructional tools have also become available in the form of immersive virtual reality of excavations. A number of projects have since utilized these tools in an effort to extract the pedagogical potential of archaeological 3D models (Galeazzi et al 2010;Levy et al 2010;Forte 2014;Knabb et al 2014;Galeazzi and Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco 2017).…”
Section: Broader Implications In Pedagogy and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous projects have outlined the utility of using 3D virtual environments to express archaeological concepts and excavation techniques through displays such as the Powerwall and Cave systems [e.g. Galeazzi et al 2010;Levy et al 2010;Forte 2014;Knabb et al 2014;Galeazzi and Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco 2017]. The 3D Virtual Dig (3VD) developed at the University of California, Merced was a 3D application aimed at teaching excavation techniques in an introductory archaeology course [Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco et al 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%