2010
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004183681.i-406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory as History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Piggybacking off this framing, the conceptual context and purpose for employing 'agrarian capitalism'typically for dating and locating the sui generis technological dynamic characterizing capitalist developmentcontinues to set the terms on debates centred on the birth of capitalism (Anievas & Nisancioglu, 2015;Banaji, 2010;Heller, 2011). Serving as something of a necessary intermediary between pre-capitalism and fully fledged capitalist social relations, agrarian capitalism conveniently 'explains' the uniqueness and immanent features of the rise of British industrial dominance.…”
Section: Most Cogently Developed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piggybacking off this framing, the conceptual context and purpose for employing 'agrarian capitalism'typically for dating and locating the sui generis technological dynamic characterizing capitalist developmentcontinues to set the terms on debates centred on the birth of capitalism (Anievas & Nisancioglu, 2015;Banaji, 2010;Heller, 2011). Serving as something of a necessary intermediary between pre-capitalism and fully fledged capitalist social relations, agrarian capitalism conveniently 'explains' the uniqueness and immanent features of the rise of British industrial dominance.…”
Section: Most Cogently Developed Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So antebellum slavery involves slaves performing wage-labour, but lacking full control over their labour power. That is, antebellum slavery provides a presumptive counterexample to the orthodox view (for a wealth of similar cases, see Banaji 2010). Consider, further, merchant and usury capital, the forms dubbed ‘antediluvian’ by Marx (1976: 266; 1981: 728).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the self-expansion of merchant capital entailed much more than the simplistic formula of 'buying cheap and selling dear'. 309 Rather, under particular circumstances, merchants could act in ways that altered and eventually transformed the direct production process, thereby reconfiguring their relations of production in a capitalist direction. 310 This is precisely what took place on the plantations, where merchants were singularly responsible for accumulating slave labour that was then put to work for exclusively commercial purposes.…”
Section: Conclusion: Colonies Merchants and The Transition To Capitamentioning
confidence: 99%