1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03210092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory for the mechanism of action of “miracle fruit”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1974). These observations support an explanation of the effect of miraculin that is based on mixture suppression, that is, the effect of sour reduction after miraculin would depend on the action of induced sweetness rather than on an intrinsic suppression of sourness due to miraculin itself, as claimed previously by other authors (Dzendolet 1969).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1974). These observations support an explanation of the effect of miraculin that is based on mixture suppression, that is, the effect of sour reduction after miraculin would depend on the action of induced sweetness rather than on an intrinsic suppression of sourness due to miraculin itself, as claimed previously by other authors (Dzendolet 1969).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In a series of psychophysical experiments, in fact, it was shown that when miracle fruit was added to citric acid, sourness was suppressed and sweetness emerged, in a comparable way as adding sugar to citric acid makes it taste sweet (Bartoshuk et al 1974). These observations support an explanation of the effect of miraculin that is based on mixture suppression, that is, the effect of sour reduction after miraculin would depend on the action of induced sweetness rather than on an intrinsic suppression of sourness due to miraculin itself, as claimed previously by other authors (Dzendolet 1969).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Two hypotheses are commonly revealed as either subtractive or additive action (Bartoshuk et al 1974). The subtractive mechanism suggested a paralyzing effect of the miracle fruit throughout sour receptors sites blocking, in such a way that the taste perceived for a substance essentially depends on the taste quality induced by its anion (Dzendolet 1969). In opposite, the miracle fruit is thought to simply add sweetness to sour substances (Kurihara and Beidler 1969).…”
Section: Nutrients Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it showed high antioxidant activity (Du, Shen, Zhang, Prinyawiwatkul, & Xu, 2014). Studies have investigated developing miraculin into an alternative sweetener (Bartoshuk, Gentile, Moskowitz, & Meiselman, 1974;Wong & Kern, 2011;Igarashi et al 2013), its molecular mechanisms (Bartoshuk, 1987;Dzendolet, 1969;Paladino, Costantini, Colonna, & Facchiano, 2008Yamamoto et al 2006), and the engineering of other plants to produce miraculin (Sun, Cui, Ma, & Ezura, 2006;Sun, Kataoka, Yano, & Ezura, 2007;He at al. 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%