2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis under alternative returns to scale axioms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using basic DEA models for different types of returns to scale and feasibility checks of inequality set for each point produced by the algorithm can easily show that the result is the same as that of the MILP model presented by Kazemi Matin and Kuosmanen (). See Theorem for more detail.…”
Section: Some Characteristics Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using basic DEA models for different types of returns to scale and feasibility checks of inequality set for each point produced by the algorithm can easily show that the result is the same as that of the MILP model presented by Kazemi Matin and Kuosmanen (). See Theorem for more detail.…”
Section: Some Characteristics Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Then, they proposed a modification of the classic Farrell input efficiency measure and derived a MILP formulation for computing it. Kazemi Matin and Kuosmanen () extended and generalized Kuosmanen and Kazemi Matin's axiomatic foundation for the IDEA to the variable, non‐decreasing and non‐increasing returns to scale environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuosmanen and Kazemi Matin () developed a new axiomatic foundation for integer‐valued DEA models, proposed a modification of the classic Farrel input efficiency measure, and derived an MILP formulation—the integer DEA “IDEA” model —for computing it. Kazemi Matin and Kuosmanen () generalized the IDEA model in different types of return‐to‐scales. On the other hand, Alirezaee and Rafiee Sani () proposed a numeration algorithm (NA) that computed efficiency scores and performance targets for integer‐valued DEA without solving any integer‐programming problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrated method to performance evaluation using DEA and fuzzy preference relations has been proposed by Wu (). Kuosmanen and Matin (); Kazemi Matin and Kuosmanen () proposed an axiomatic foundation to improve the integer‐valued DEA model of Lozano and Villa (). They proposed a modification of the classic input efficiency measure and derived a mixed integer linear programming DEA formulation for computing this measure of efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%