1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9507.00093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Mind in Preadolescence: Relations Between Social Understanding and Social Competence

Abstract: Theory of mind (ToM) underlies the ability to attribute mental states to people as a way of understanding their social behaviour. Although ToM development is an active area of research, most empirical investigations focus on infants and young children. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to assess ToM in preadolescents and to determine whether individual differences in this mentalizing ability relate to social competence and relate differently for girls and for boys. It was hypothesized that preadolescen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
220
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
37
220
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, in one of the two stories, participants could get 0 -2 points for including mental states in predicting behaviours (answers 1 and 3) and 0 -6 points for the quality of each explanations (answers 2 and 4). The aggregate results lead to a range of 0-8 points in one story, 0 -16 points in the whole two-story task for the Polish sample and 0-42 in Canadian sample (see Bosacki, 2000;Bosacki & Astington, 1999). Regardless of the range of results, in each study, higher scores reflect higher ToM understanding.…”
Section: Codingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, in one of the two stories, participants could get 0 -2 points for including mental states in predicting behaviours (answers 1 and 3) and 0 -6 points for the quality of each explanations (answers 2 and 4). The aggregate results lead to a range of 0-8 points in one story, 0 -16 points in the whole two-story task for the Polish sample and 0-42 in Canadian sample (see Bosacki, 2000;Bosacki & Astington, 1999). Regardless of the range of results, in each study, higher scores reflect higher ToM understanding.…”
Section: Codingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Gleaned from past research, to assess ToM adapted versions of two brief vignettes consisting of an ambiguous social situation were used (social ambiguous stories; Bosacki, 2000Bosacki, , 2008Bosacki & Astington, 1999). Borrowing from theoretical work that views ToM as a vehicle or instrument that is used to co-construct or narrate one's social reality (Astington, 1993;Astington & Pelletier, 1996), and studies that investigate an advanced ToM through the use of narratives (Hughes, 2011), this task aimed to assess the ToM involved in interpreting social meaning from ambiguous stories.…”
Section: Theory Of Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors (Astington, 2001;Bosacki and Astington, 1999;Slomkowski and Dunn, 1996) have stressed the point that theory of mind development should be studied in relation to 'real-world consequences' (Astington, 2001, p. 685). Most research on theory of mind and emotions provides participants with explicit information about the protagonist's mental states and children are asked for emotion predictions (Hadwin and Perner, 1991;Harris et al, 1989;Rieffe et al, 2001;Symons et al, 1997;Wellman, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um estudo com pré-adolescentes, por exemplo, não revelou uma relação significativa entre teoria da mente e popularidade controlando-se o efeito da competência verbal (Bosacki & Astington, 1999). Os participantes que apresentavam uma compreensão social mais elaborada, por outro lado, foram avaliados pelos pares como mais hábeis em lidar com situações sociais.…”
Section: Inteligência Emocional Aceitação Social E Atributos Comportunclassified