1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(85)90208-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An answer can be given only relatively to computability concepts on the measures and functions under consideration, which must be defined in advance. For studying computability on general spaces we use the representation approach for computable analysis (TTE, Type Two theory of Effectivity) [KW85,Wei00,BHW08]. In TTE computability on finite words w ∈ Σ * and infinite sequences p ∈ Σ N is defined explicitly, for example by Turing machines, and then such finite or infinite sequences are used as names of abstract objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An answer can be given only relatively to computability concepts on the measures and functions under consideration, which must be defined in advance. For studying computability on general spaces we use the representation approach for computable analysis (TTE, Type Two theory of Effectivity) [KW85,Wei00,BHW08]. In TTE computability on finite words w ∈ Σ * and infinite sequences p ∈ Σ N is defined explicitly, for example by Turing machines, and then such finite or infinite sequences are used as names of abstract objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(in terminology of Section 5), principal continuous representations. This notion was introduced in [KW85] for countably based spaces and it was extensively studied by many authors. In [BH02] a close relation of admissible representations of countably based spaces to open continuous representations was established.…”
Section: Admissible Total Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turing associates the real number (2c 0 − 1)n + ∞ r=1 (2c r − 1) (2/3) r to the infinite binary sequence c 0 1 n 0c 1 c 2 · · · ∈ {0, 1} ω . 1 Our choice of representation differs from Turing's, but it is equivalent in the sense of Kreitz and Weihrauch [15]; in particular, they both induce the same computable structure on R. See Weihrauch [43] for a thorough introduction to the theory of representations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let β = i∈N k∈A (i) ,k≤n−i 2 −k−1 . For 6 The reverse is not true, so b-representation is not equivalent-again in the sense of Kreitz and Weihrauch [15,43] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%