2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

-theory on Spin(7) manifolds, fluxes and 3D, =1 supergravity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(133 reference statements)
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it was shown in [5] that the stabilizer stratification induced by ξ 1 and ξ 2 on M has SU(2), SU(3), G 2 and SU(4) strata, whose description is considerably more complex. This stratification of M coincides with a certain coarsening of the preimage of the connected refinement of the canonical Whitney stratification [6,7] of a four-dimensional compact semi-algebraic [8,9] body P ⊂ R 4 through a certain map B : M → R 4 whose image is contained in P. As shown in [5], this complicated stratification generalizes what happens in the much simpler case of N = 1 M-theory flux compactifications on eight-manifolds [10][11][12][13] (which extend the classically fluxless case of [14][15][16]), where the relevant semi-algebraic body is the interval [−1, 1], endowed with its Whitney stratification.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)174mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, it was shown in [5] that the stabilizer stratification induced by ξ 1 and ξ 2 on M has SU(2), SU(3), G 2 and SU(4) strata, whose description is considerably more complex. This stratification of M coincides with a certain coarsening of the preimage of the connected refinement of the canonical Whitney stratification [6,7] of a four-dimensional compact semi-algebraic [8,9] body P ⊂ R 4 through a certain map B : M → R 4 whose image is contained in P. As shown in [5], this complicated stratification generalizes what happens in the much simpler case of N = 1 M-theory flux compactifications on eight-manifolds [10][11][12][13] (which extend the classically fluxless case of [14][15][16]), where the relevant semi-algebraic body is the interval [−1, 1], endowed with its Whitney stratification.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)174mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…E Some topological properties of singular foliations defined by a Morse one-form 55 E.1 Some topological invariants of M 55 E.2 Estimate for the number of splitting saddle points 55 E. 3 Estimates for c and N min 56 E. 4 Criteria for existence and number of homologically independent compact leaves 56 E.5 Generic forms 56 E.6 Exact forms 57 E. 7 Behavior under exact perturbations 57 1 Introduction N = 1 flux compactifications of eleven-dimensional supergravity on eight-manifolds M down to AdS 3 spaces [1,2] provide a vast extension of the better studied class of compactifications down to 3-dimensional Minkowski space [3][4][5], having the advantage that they are already consistent at the classical level [2]. They form a useful testing ground for various proposals aimed at providing unified descriptions of flux backgrounds [6] and may be relevant to recent attempts to gain a better understanding of F-theory [7].…”
Section: Jhep03(2015)116mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Cases 1 and 2 correspond to the classical limit of the compactifications studied in [3][4][5]. Case 3 was studied in [2,8].…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ansatz for the supersymmetry generator is: 20) where ξ i ∈ Γ(M, S) are Majorana spinors of spin 1/2 on the internal space (M, g) and ζ i are Majorana spinors on (N, g 3 ) which satisfy the Killing equation with positive Killing constant. 3 Assuming that ζ i are Killing spinor on the AdS 3 space (N, g 3 ), the supersymmetry condition is satisfied if ξ i satisfies (1.1), where:…”
Section: The Case Of Compactifications To Adsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they can support small fluxes at the quantum level, which are suppressed by inverse powers of the size of the compactification manifold. Since such fluxes are difficult to control beyond leading order [20,21], a natural idea is to consider instead compactifications down to AdS 3 spaces. As pointed out in [19], compactifications of M-theory down to AdS 3 do support classical fluxes, which are therefore not suppressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%