In this article, I explore some implications of Kelly's philosophical position of the universe being integral or interconnected. Based on this analysis, I further develop experiential personal construct concepts of transpersonal reverence and transpersonal responsibility. I then describe problems in these areas with respect to our relations with our significant others (interpersonal), our culture, humanity at large, and the more-than-human world. I conclude with a discussion of the ways Kelly's position challenges us to have faith in things unseen as well as the humility to recognize that our particular faiths will not be final ones.In a previous article, I began an exploration of one of the bedrock but ignored principles of Kellian psychology (Leitner, 2010). Even before he laid out his philosophy of constructive alternativism, Kelly described several philosophical assumptions that underlie his approach to psychology. One of these assumptions, that the universe is integral, was the basis of my earlier article. In this article, after reviewing Kelly's position on the integral universe, I will elaborate and clarify the ways that Kelly's integral universe concept lead us to issues I call transpersonal reverence and transpersonal responsibility.
The Integral UniverseKelly (1955), in the opening to his magnum opus, made it clear that he viewed the universe as integral. By integral, Kelly meant that all aspects of the universe are interconnected and related. His