2012
DOI: 10.1128/aac.05098-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Amprenavir Concentrations in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…na: no activation. ni: no inhibition. b Published CSF/plasma. c Published p K a . d A D : cross-sectional area determined by molecular modeling. e A D : cross-sectional area determined experimentally by means of surface activity measurement. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…na: no activation. ni: no inhibition. b Published CSF/plasma. c Published p K a . d A D : cross-sectional area determined by molecular modeling. e A D : cross-sectional area determined experimentally by means of surface activity measurement. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, published data showed that efavirenz concentrations in CSF are similar to the free concentration in plasma, suggesting that only the unbound efavirenz diffuses across the BBB. 27 Compounds with large A D such as PI and maraviroc have low CSF/plasma ratios [30][31][32]34,35,37 as a result of their lower rate of passive influx compared to active efflux (Figures 6 and 7). Indinavir CSF/plasma ratio is paradoxically high, which has been attributed to its lower degree of protein binding.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like ATV, CSF concentrations did not differ if ritonavir was administered concomitantly, in contrast with the findings in plasma, where drug concentrations were significantly higher in patients taking fAPV/r. 65 Although the above studies provide useful information in terms of PI levels achieved in the CSF, they have mainly involved patients receiving these drugs as part of triple cART regimens, thus precluding comparisons between drug level and virological efficacy in the CSF. It is a priority, for LDR studies of CNS efficacy, to establish whether there is an association between drug levels in CSF and plasma and virological outcomes in the CSF in patients receiving PIs as monotherapy.…”
Section: Achieving Inhibitory Intrathecal Pi Levels: Cerebrospinal Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritonavir boosting was associated with higher plasma amprenavir concentrations, but not with higher CSF levels. The authors classified amprenavir with an intermediate ranking in relation to other PIs in terms of CNS penetration[65]. Darunavir is a very potent PI that effectively suppresses virus in both treatment-naïve and heavily treated patients.…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Handmentioning
confidence: 99%