2019
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic citizens and clients: diverging healthcare practices in Malawi's prenatal clinics

Abstract: This article examines how HIV policies and the funding priorities of global institutions affect practices in prenatal clinics and the quality of healthcare women receive. Data consist of observations at health centres in Lilongwe, Malawi and interviews with providers (N = 37). I argue that neoliberal ideology, which structures the global health field, produces a fragmented healthcare system on the ground. Findings show two kinds of healthcare practices within the same clinic: donor‐funded NGOs took on HIV serv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article has highlighted the damaging legacy of colonialism, through universalising definitions of disability and the short‐termism of both UK research funding and certain NGOs for workers with disabilities and long‐term health conditions in Malawi. Our data echoes the findings of Zhou (2019), who argues that within Malawi, formal health care is usually impairment or disease‐focussed, for example, focussing on pregnant women with HIV. This individualised, condition‐specific biomedical approach, while benefitting some people, is often informed by neoliberal ideologies that fund the work of NGOs delivering such care, and risks ignoring community health care and familial structures of society (Kalinga, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This article has highlighted the damaging legacy of colonialism, through universalising definitions of disability and the short‐termism of both UK research funding and certain NGOs for workers with disabilities and long‐term health conditions in Malawi. Our data echoes the findings of Zhou (2019), who argues that within Malawi, formal health care is usually impairment or disease‐focussed, for example, focussing on pregnant women with HIV. This individualised, condition‐specific biomedical approach, while benefitting some people, is often informed by neoliberal ideologies that fund the work of NGOs delivering such care, and risks ignoring community health care and familial structures of society (Kalinga, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In sum, in these two instances of surplus death, the normalised cycle of life, death and burial has been unsettled by active or passive necropower creating a 'bad death' Human Remains and Violence 8/1 (2022), [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Nicole Iturriaga and Derek S. Denman for thousands of expendable citizens. As bodies are unable to receive full death rites, families are unable to complete and the process of mourning.…”
Section: Disrupted Funerary Practices and Complicated Griefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whyte et al (2013), for example, document stock-outs in Uganda arising at the interstices of a patchwork landscape of "projectified" donor-funded interventions where lack of coordination and heterogeneity are notable. Umlauf and Park (2018) connect perennial pharmaceutical stock-outs in the same country to supply-chain interruptions arising in an under-funded health system reliant upon improvisation and bricolage (see Livingston, 2012;Zhou, 2019). Others suggest that stock-outs are instantiations of more mundane problems, such as limited accessibility, corruption, or staff incompetence (Schouten et al, 2011;Bateman, 2013).…”
Section: Towards a Geography Of Stock-outsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectre of scarcity, however, still haunts these "new political geographies of scaleup" (Kenworthy 2017, p. 72) as donors impose -or 'fast-track' -market rationalities onto recipient states who, in turn, take these interventions as "premises for the rationalization of welfare, reciprocity, and citizenship" (Ingram 2013, p. 13). A highly selective treatment apparatus emerges here -built upon the roll-out of neoliberal governmental practices (Sparke, 2019) -that denies ART to those deemed undeserving, irresponsible, or incompetent, and allocates it instead to clients deemed worthy, adherent, and supplicant (Whyte et al, 2013;Reed, 2018;Zhou, 2019).…”
Section: Much Of This Work Is Inspired Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation