Therapist Training and Supervision in Clinical Trials: Implications for Clinical Practice

Roth, Anthony; Pilling, Stephen; Turner, Jenny

doi:10.1017/s1352465810000068

Cited by 83 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fidelity in terms of training providers requires that the training of providers (for purposes of our review, the super visors) is appropriately specified and standardized, and that there are measures of skill acquisition to determine how provider skills are improved and maintained over time. We have supplemented these criteria with those from Roth et al (2010) requiring that there is a published description of the training procedures (e.g., a manual; see Table 1). This was our only addition to the fidelity framework, included to better specify the original meaning of training in Bellg et al (2004) and Borrelli et al (2005).…”

Section: Rationale For the Fidelity Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the next step, we reviewed our final sample o f 12 studies using the fidelity framework criteria drawn directly from Borrelli et al (2005) and supplemented by selected criteria from Roth et al (2010), as noted above. Our plan was to review the 12 studies against a well-defined and conceptually coherent set o f minimum standards, comprising the five elements o f the fidelity framework, in a reliable and replicable manner, as per a checklist or audit approach.…”

Section: Review and Coding Procedures Based On The Fidelity Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They nonetheless afford outstanding illustrations of how one might address fidelity framework criteria. Following the ap proach used within Roth et al (2010) and Ellis and Ladany (1997), we seek to highlight good practice and to suggest options for advancing research. Table 3 again summarizes the fidelity frame work, this time set alongside a selection of studies that illustrate both the wide range of outcomes that have been measured and some innovative or best-practice methods for achieving those outcomes.…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the past decade, there have been at least eight reviews dealing more or less directly with the effect of supervision on patient out comes, including Watkins (2011), Ellis, Ladany, Krengel, and Schult (1996) , Freitas (2002), Holloway and Neufeldt (1995), Milne, Aylott, Fitzpatrick, and Ellis (2008), Roth, Pilling, and Turner (2010), Tsui (1997) , and Wheeler and Richards (2007). These reviews all critiqued a carefully selected sample of empirical studies, concluding that there were myriad methodological weaknesses within this research.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and reformulation of outcome evaluation in clinical supervision: Applying the fidelity framework.

Reiser¹,

Milne

2014

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although a strikingly diverse range of outcomes have been measured within clinical supervision research, a dominant perspective is that clinical outcomes remain the "acid test" of its effectiveness (Ellis & Ladany, 1997). We question the wisdom of this acid test logic in 2 ways. First, we summarize alternative conceptu alizations of outcome from within the supervision field, highlighting several important reasons for considering clinical benefit as but one of several equally valid, stepwise outcomes. The fidelity framework (Borrelli et al., 2005) is drawn upon to show how these complementary outcomes may be logically and advantageously combined. This framework's dimensions are the design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment of an intervention. Second, a sample of 12 interpretable studies of the clinical outcomes of supervision is evaluated in terms of the studies' attention to these 5 dimensions. From this conceptual and empirical review, it is concluded that an overemphasis on clinical outcomes carries unnecessary risks (e.g., weak causal reasoning and a failure to identify mechanisms of change), while underemphasizing the several benefits of a more inclusive approach (e.g., increasing outcome research and improving supervision).

show abstract

Section: Rationale For the Fidelity Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review and Coding Procedures Based On The Fidelity Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and reformulation of outcome evaluation in clinical supervision: Applying the fidelity framework.

Reiser¹,

Milne

2014

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With regards to clinical practice, greater regulation of supervision might make a difference to patient outcomes. Such regulation might take the form of more stringent protocols for supervision in clinical settings, similar to those used in many RCTs (Gibbons et al, 2013;Roth, Pilling, & Turner, 2010). In particular, protocols should address clinician characteristics and how they…”

Section: Supervision For Treatment Of Depression 10mentioning

confidence: 99%

Supervision for treatment of depression: An experimental study of the role of therapist gender and anxiety

Simpson-Southward

Waller

Hardy

2016

Behaviour Research and Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article available under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) eprints@whiterose.ac.uk https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version -refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher's website. TakedownIf you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

show abstract

Alcohol Use Disorders

Sher¹

2010

The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This guideline is one of three pieces of NICE guidance addressing alcohol-use disorders. The present guideline addresses the management of alcohol dependence and harmful alcohol use in people 10 years and older including: assessment, pharmacological interventions, psychological and psychosocial interventions, and settings of assisted withdrawal and rehabilitation. The two other NICE guidelines address: 1) The prevention of alcohol-use disorders in people 10 years and older, which is public health guidance on the price of alcohol, advertising and availability of alcohol, how best to detect alcohol misuse both in and outside primary care and brief interventions to manage alcohol misuse in these settings (NICE, 2010a), and 2) The assessment and clinical management in people 10 years and older of acute alcohol withdrawal, including delirium tremens, liver damage, acute and chronic pancreatitis and the management of Wernicke's encephalopathy (NICE, 2010b). This guideline will sometimes use the term alcohol misuse, which will encompass both people with alcohol dependence and harmful alcohol use. The guideline recommendations have been developed by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, lay member, service user and carer representatives, and guideline methodologists, after careful consideration of the best available evidence. It is intended that the guideline will be useful to clinicians and service commissioners in providing and planning high-quality care for people who misuse alcohol while also emphasising the importance of the experience of care for them and their carers. Although the evidence base is expanding, there are also a number of gaps in the literature. The guideline makes a number of research recommendations specifically to address gaps in the evidence base. In the meantime, it is hoped that the guideline will assist clinicians, people who misuse alcohol and their carers by identifying the merits of particular treatment approaches where the evidence from research and clinical experience exists. National guideline 1.1.1What are clinical practice guidelines? Clinical practice guidelines are 'systematically developed statements that assist clinicians and patients in making decisions about appropriate treatment for specific conditions' (Mann, 1996). They are derived from the best available research evidence, using predetermined and systematic methods to identify and evaluate the evidence relating to the specific condition in question. Where evidence is lacking, the guidelines incorporate statements and recommendations based upon the consensus statements developed by the Guideline Development Group (GDG). Clinical guidelines are intended to improve the process and outcomes of healthcare in a number of different ways. They can:

show abstract

Therapist Training and Supervision in Clinical Trials: Implications for Clinical Practice

Cited by 83 publications

References 49 publications

A systematic review and reformulation of outcome evaluation in clinical supervision: Applying the fidelity framework.

A systematic review and reformulation of outcome evaluation in clinical supervision: Applying the fidelity framework.

Supervision for treatment of depression: An experimental study of the role of therapist gender and anxiety

Alcohol Use Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About