Therapists’ Perceptions of Social Media and Video Game Technologies in Upper Limb Rehabilitation

Abstract

BackgroundThe application of technologies, such as video gaming and social media for rehabilitation, is garnering interest in the medical field. However, little research has examined clinicians’ perspectives regarding technology adoption by their clients.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to explore therapists’ perceptions of how young people and adults with hemiplegia use gaming and social media technologies in daily life and in rehabilitation, and to identify barriers to using these technologies in rehabilitation.MethodsWe conducted two focus groups comprised of ten occupational therapists/physiotherapists who provide neurorehabilitation to individuals with hemiplegia secondary to stroke or cerebral palsy. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The diffusion of innovations theory provided a framework to interpret emerging themes.ResultsTherapists were using technology in a limited capacity. They identified barriers to using social media and gaming technology with their clients, including a lack of age appropriateness, privacy issues with social media, limited transfer of training, and a lack of accessibility of current systems. Therapists also questioned their role in the context of technology-based interventions. The opportunity for social interaction was perceived as a major benefit of integrated gaming and social media.ConclusionsThis study reveals the complexities associated with adopting new technologies in clinical practice, including the need to consider both client and clinician factors. Despite reporting several challenges with applying gaming and social media technology with clinical populations, therapists identified opportunities for increased social interactions and were willing to help shape the development of an upper limb training system that could more readily meet the needs of clients with hemiplegia. By considering the needs of both therapists and clients, technology developers may increase the likelihood that clinicians will adopt innovative technologies.

Therapists’ Perspective on Virtual Reality Training in Patients after Stroke: A Qualitative Study Reporting Focus Group Results from Three Hospitals

“…To develop task-oriented VR game characteristics and to obtain hardware that more adaptively handles human movements, participants expressed their desire for an intensive interprofessional collaboration with VR technology developers. The collaboration desire is supported by findings from Tatla et al [28]. Improved interprofessional cooperation and knowledge exchange between engineers of computer-based devices and therapists as experts of human movements and patient-centred needs in daily living could reduce the gap that currently available technology leaves in end-user satisfaction.…”

Promoting Therapists’ Use of Motor Learning Strategies within Virtual Reality-Based Stroke Rehabilitation

“…This observation may indicate that therapists were verbally correcting movement patterns. Indeed, one of the common disadvantages of VR use is the potential for poor movement patterns to be elicited, given that users may be more motivated to achieve game success rather than to perform movements correctly [22,43]. Therapist instructions and feedback were amongst the MLS seen ‘often’ (a mode of 2 on the MLSRI-20).…”

Virtual Reality and Serious Games in Neurorehabilitation of Children and Adults: Prevention, Plasticity, and Participation

“…There are concerns that the variety of games make it difficult to find the best exercise to meet a person’s needs and may shift the person’s attention from the movement practice itself to the game play, which may degrade the movement practice. 146 We offer suggestions for education, practice and research that may enhance informed adoption of the technology.…”