2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/987/1/012012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal and non-thermal explosion in metals ablation by femtosecond laser pulse: classical approach of the Two Temperature Model

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a classical Two Temperature Model TTMc where we consider the metal film during the irradiation like an ideal plasma. The numerical results are comparing to those finding by the existing TTM and the experimental data. In our model The cooper is taken as a target irradiated by a single laser pulse with 120 fs at 800 nm wavelength in air room. Our numerical results shown that there are a thermal and non-thermal explosion successively occurs in metal ablation by ultrashort laser pulse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we deduce that the most laser energy is deposited by the subsequent pulses reserved for the overheating of the same focal volume irradiated by the first pulse. We notice in Figure 7 that at F = 1 J/cm 2 , the ablation rate is disordered, which confirms our previous proposal [32] that the physical mechanism changes when the ablation phases change [6], where at low fluence, electron-ion collision is the most dominant, implying a gentle ablation, but at high fluence, electron-phonon collision is the most dominant, implying a strong ablation. In summary, the first intense ultrashort laser pulse can produce a superheated liquid [10,13], but because the interpulse separation is less than the thermal relaxation time, the thermal wave has no time to propagate deeper into the material.…”
Section: Fluence (J/cm 2 )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, we deduce that the most laser energy is deposited by the subsequent pulses reserved for the overheating of the same focal volume irradiated by the first pulse. We notice in Figure 7 that at F = 1 J/cm 2 , the ablation rate is disordered, which confirms our previous proposal [32] that the physical mechanism changes when the ablation phases change [6], where at low fluence, electron-ion collision is the most dominant, implying a gentle ablation, but at high fluence, electron-phonon collision is the most dominant, implying a strong ablation. In summary, the first intense ultrashort laser pulse can produce a superheated liquid [10,13], but because the interpulse separation is less than the thermal relaxation time, the thermal wave has no time to propagate deeper into the material.…”
Section: Fluence (J/cm 2 )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…To calculate the heat propagation in the material, the two-temperature model is used [4,[18][19][20][21], in which the evolution of the electron temperature T e is described by C e ∂ t T e = ∇ • (λ e (T e )∇T e ) − G(T e − T ph ) + S,…”
Section: Two-temperature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the heat conduction problem can be described by one-dimensional heat conduction equation along the direction of laser irradiation. At the same time, in the process of ultra-short pulsed laser ablation, the heat affected area is small, which makes the thickness of melting layer smaller [65]. Therefore, the effect of the dielectric layer is not considered in this model, which has a great influence on nanosecond laser ablation [66,67].…”
Section: Heat Conduction Equation For Two Different Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the limited validity of the TTM still exists [60][61][62][63], one of which is that the validity verification at higher laser fluence is still problematic [63]. In addition, the effects of plasma shielding are not considered in most TTMs, which may lead to overestimation of ablation depth at higher laser fluence [64,65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%