1992
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(92)87017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal behaviour of dicarboxylic acids. Determination of melting points by DTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal analysis confirmed that both MAL and SA lost weight after melting, suggesting decomposition, and the boiling of MAL, and/or conversion of MAL into fumaric acid, as reported in the literature (34)(35)(36)(37). Since MAL and SA rapidly decomposed after the crystal melted, cocrystal preparation using a melting method as previously reported (38) would be difficult.…”
Section: Cocrystal Screening and Solid Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thermal analysis confirmed that both MAL and SA lost weight after melting, suggesting decomposition, and the boiling of MAL, and/or conversion of MAL into fumaric acid, as reported in the literature (34)(35)(36)(37). Since MAL and SA rapidly decomposed after the crystal melted, cocrystal preparation using a melting method as previously reported (38) would be difficult.…”
Section: Cocrystal Screening and Solid Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2 . A comparison of diffraction peaks of the obtained BOF-s were carried out with the main peaks of the solid FA and initial BBN-s. Three diffraction patterns can be attributed to FA [4] , BBN-I (PDF #70–1226), BBN-II [3] and the new compounds with the main d (Å): 10.47; 3.57; 3.47; 3.36; 2.98; 2.82; 1.99; 1.76. XRD patterns of the obtained powders contain broadened peaks of BOF with the one intensified peak at 10.47 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Suzuki [16,17] published on the thermal behaviour of maleic acid and fumaric acid and concluded that the difference in the melting points (Tin) is due to symmetry effects. In fumaric acid there is less crowding and less van der Waals strain as the two larger substituents in this trans isomer are located further apart than in the cis isomer, resulting in a higher T m for the first.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%