2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal–chemical–mechanical gun bore erosion of an advanced artillery system part two: modeling and predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 When there is a lack of measured data for designing new weapons, degradation data can also be obtained by theoretical formulas and/or numerical simulation: under a given working condition, the wall temperature distribution of the gun bore can be calculated by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models. 18,34 The ablation depth value of each bullet in the dangerous section (starting position of rifling) can be deducted, [15][16][17][18]21 thus the degradation data (ie, muzzle velocity) varying with projectile quantity can be simulated by solving the interior ballistics equations. 35 Because of the complexity of the physical model, we did not use the theoretical method to establish the empirical model in this paper.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 When there is a lack of measured data for designing new weapons, degradation data can also be obtained by theoretical formulas and/or numerical simulation: under a given working condition, the wall temperature distribution of the gun bore can be calculated by Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models. 18,34 The ablation depth value of each bullet in the dangerous section (starting position of rifling) can be deducted, [15][16][17][18]21 thus the degradation data (ie, muzzle velocity) varying with projectile quantity can be simulated by solving the interior ballistics equations. 35 Because of the complexity of the physical model, we did not use the theoretical method to establish the empirical model in this paper.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where λ is the thermal conduction coefficient of gun barrel, g T is the temperature of propellant gas obtained from interior ballistic solution, 1 h is the convective heat transfer coefficient between propellant gas and the inside wall of gun barrel, 2 h is the convective heat transfer coefficient between ambient gas and the outside wall of gun barrel, 0 r is the internal radius of gun barrel, and R represents the external radius of gun barrel.…”
Section: Deterministic Conditions Of Solution (1) Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that the internal bore erosion is the result of the combined effects of thermal impact, chemical reaction, and mechanical friction, and the thermal factor plays a primary role [1][2][3][4] . Heating of gun barrel will cause several negative influences, such as erosion of gun bore, limitation of firing rate, decrease of firing accuracy, and the presence of thermal stress in gun barrel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high temperature inner wall of the barrel has been considered to be a factor of leading self-ignition of propellants that can endanger the safety of the launcher and working staffs [2]. In addition, the ablation wear rate of the inner wall will increase due to the excessive temperature [3][4][5]. Ablation wear of the barrel is the main factor limiting the performance of the launcher, which has been studied by many researchers [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%