1981
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(81)90663-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal conductivity of NbSe3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the thermal conductivity of fibers with diameters less than 12 μm is challenging. Here, we used a self-heating technique , that takes advantage of the electrically conducting nature of the fibers to determine the thermal conductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures (more details about the technique and analysis can be found in the Supporting Information). The results are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Determining the thermal conductivity of fibers with diameters less than 12 μm is challenging. Here, we used a self-heating technique , that takes advantage of the electrically conducting nature of the fibers to determine the thermal conductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures (more details about the technique and analysis can be found in the Supporting Information). The results are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conductivities, κ, were measured for specimens from a coagulation bath sample with total draw of 1.58 and DMSO stretched samples with total draws of 1.72, 1.97, and 2.36 using a self-heating technique , (all samples spun into 10 vol % DMSO in IPA); 3–4 specimens from each sample were measured. In short, the resistance of the specimen, mounted in a four-probe configuration, was measured as a function of applied current.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly cited value is K≈600 W/mK along the basal plane at room temperature (RT) [45]. This is substantially higher than the values for typical TMCs with MX3 atomic composition, which are in the 3.5 -30 W/mK range [46][47][48][49]. The SiO2 layer under TaSe3 is also thermally resistive with the thermal conductivity K = 0.5−1.4 W/mK at RT [50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…45 This is substantially higher than the values for typical TMCs with MX 3 atomic composition, which are in the 3.5-30 W mK −1 range. [46][47][48][49] The SiO 2 layer under TaSe 3 is also thermally resistive with the thermal conductivity K = 0.5 − 1.4 W mK −1 at RT. 50 This is more than one hundred times smaller than that of Si, which has K = 145 W mK −1 in bulk form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conductive heat transfer to the contacts is determined by the thermal conductivity κ of the material which we roughly estimate by κ ≤ α · l/(8 · A cs ), l being the length and A cs the cross-section area of the sample 35 . We obtain a value of κ ≤ 3.4 W/(m K) which agrees reasonably well with the thermal conductivity of about 1.3 W/(m K) determined for alloyed DCNQI 2 Li 0.86 Cu 0.14 at 50 K, bearing in mind the increase of thermal conductivity with increasing copper content 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%