Thermal conductivity of pure gases at high pressures by use of a coaxial cylindrical cell

Yorizane, Masahiro; Yoshimura, Shooshin; Masuoka, Hirokatsu; Yoshida, Hideto

doi:10.1021/i100012a017

Cited by 12 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 7 also includes the deviations of the data of Rosenbaum and Thodos [66] and of Yorizane et al [68], which do not exceed -8.6% and -6.0%, respectively. The relative deviations do not exhibit any systematic temperature or composition trends, but are larger than the claimed uncertainty of 3% given by the authors Figure 6: Relative deviations of experimental data for the dilute gas viscosity of (CH 4 + CO 2 ) mixtures and the pure components from values calculated using the adjusted CH 4 -CO 2 potential function of the present work, the CH 4 -CH 4 potential function of reference [3], and the CO 2 -CO 2 potential function of reference [5] as a function of methane mole fraction: , Kestin and Yata [60] Relative deviations of experimental data for the dilute gas thermal conductivity of (CH 4 + CO 2 ) mixtures and the pure components from values calculated using the adjusted CH 4 -CO 2 potential function of the present work, the CH 4 -CH 4 potential function of reference [3], and the CO 2 -CO 2 potential function of reference [5] as a function of methane mole fraction: •, Rosenbaum and Thodos [66], (335 to 435) K; , Haarman [74], (328 to 468) K; •, Kestin et al [67], 301 K; , Yorizane et al [68], (298 and 308) K; , Pátek and Klomfar [75] and Pátek et al [69], 300 K;…”

Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning

confidence: 95%

“…[66,68]. The magnitude of the deviations is not surprising as the pure species data of Rosenbaum and Thodos [66] exhibit similar deviations, while the data of Yorizane et al [68], which were measured at temperatures of (298 and 308) K, deviate by as much as 6% from those of Kestin et al [67]. The most reliable experimental data for pure carbon dioxide are probably those of Haarman [74] (also depicted in Figure 7), which deviate from the computed values on average by +1.1%.…”

Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cross second virial coefficients and dilute gas transport properties of the (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) systems from accurate intermolecular potential energy surfaces

Hellmann

Bich

Vesovic

2016

The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cross second virial coefficient and the dilute gas shear viscosity, thermal conductivity, and binary diffusion coefficient have been calculated for (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) mixtures in the temperature range from (150 to 1200) K. The cross second virial coefficient was obtained using the Mayer-sampling Monte Carlo approach, while the transport properties were evaluated by means of the classical trajectory method. State-of-the-art intermolecular potential energy surfaces for the like and unlike species interactions were employed in the calculations. All potential energy surfaces are based on highly accurate quantum-chemical ab initio calculations, with the potentials for the unlike interactions reported in this work and those for the like interactions taken from our previous studies of the pure gases. The computed transport property values are in good agreement with the few available experimental data, which are limited to (CH 4 + CO 2 ) mixtures close to room temperature. The lack of reliable data makes the values of the thermophysical properties calculated in this work currently the most accurate estimates for lowdensity (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) mixtures. Tables of recommended values for all investigated thermophysical properties as a function of temperature and composition are provided.

show abstract

Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross second virial coefficients and dilute gas transport properties of the (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) systems from accurate intermolecular potential energy surfaces

Hellmann

Bich

Vesovic

2016

The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(17) by less than −1%. The data by Yorizane et al [18], measured using a coaxial cylindrical cell instrument, deviate [24] and by Imaishi et al [25] were both obtained with a transient hot-wire instrument and are systematically lower by about 2%. The data by Assael and Wakeham [26] and Haran et al [19] were also measured using a transient hot-wire instrument in Tables VIII and IX, respectively.…”

Section: Nitrogenmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…The data obtained by Yorizane et al [18] were measured using a vertical coaxial cylindrical cell with an estimated uncertainty of only 2.5%. From Fig.…”

Section: Argonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Diffusivity, and Heat Capacity of Gaseous Argon and Nitrogen

Sun

Venart

2005

Int J Thermophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low-pressure thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity measurements are reported for argon and nitrogen in the temperature range from 295 to 350 K at pressures from 0.34 to 6.9 MPa using an absolute transient hot-wire instrument. Thermal conductivity measurements were also made with the same instrument in its steady-state mode of operation. The measurements are estimated to have an uncertainty of 1% for the transient thermal conductivity, 3% for the steady-state thermal conductivity, and 4% for thermal diffusivity. The values of isobaric specific heat, derived from the measured thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity, are considered accurate to 5% although this is dependent upon the uncertainty of the equation of state utilized.

show abstract

“…Measurements at higher temperatures were also performed by Senftleben 36, 38 and Senftleben et al 40 in a concentric–cylinder instrument with an uncertainty of 1–2%. Concentric–cylinder instruments were also employed by Zheng et al , 29 Yorizane et al , 30 and Lenoir and Comings 39 with uncertainties of 3, 3, and 1.5% respectively; thus these sets were also included in the primary data sets. The measurements of Lambert et al , 37 performed in a hot–wire apparatus have been successfully employed in previous reference correlations.…”

Section: Thermal-conductivity Correlationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reference Correlations of the Thermal Conductivity of Ethene and Propene

Assael

Koutian

Huber

et al. 2016

Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New, wide-range reference equations for the thermal conductivity of ethene and propene as a function of temperature and density are presented. The equations are based in part upon a body of experimental data that has been critically assessed for internal consistency and for agreement with theory whenever possible. For ethene, we estimate the uncertainty (at the 95% confidence level) for the thermal conductivity from 110 K to 520 K at pressures up to 200 MPa to be 5% for the compressed liquid and supercritical phases. For the low-pressure gas phase (to 0.1 MPa) over the temperature range 270 K to 680 K, the estimated uncertainty is 4%. The correlation is valid from 110 K to 680 K and up to 200 MPa, but it behaves in a physically reasonable manner down to the triple point and may be used at pressures up to 300 MPa, although the uncertainty will be larger in regions where experimental data were unavailable. In the case of propene, data are much more limited. We estimate the uncertainty for the thermal conductivity of propene from 180 K to 625 K at pressures up to 50 MPa to be 5% for the gas, liquid, and supercritical phases. The correlation is valid from 180 K to 625 K and up to 50 MPa, but it behaves in a physically reasonable manner down to the triple point and may be used at pressures up to 100 MPa, although the uncertainty will be larger in regions where experimental data were unavailable. For both fluids, uncertainties in the critical region are much larger, since the thermal conductivity approaches infinity at the critical point and is very sensitive to small changes in density.

show abstract

Thermal conductivity of pure gases at high pressures by use of a coaxial cylindrical cell

Cited by 12 publications

References 5 publications

Cross second virial coefficients and dilute gas transport properties of the (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) systems from accurate intermolecular potential energy surfaces

Cross second virial coefficients and dilute gas transport properties of the (CH 4 + CO 2 ), (CH 4 + H 2 S), and (H 2 S + CO 2 ) systems from accurate intermolecular potential energy surfaces

Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Diffusivity, and Heat Capacity of Gaseous Argon and Nitrogen

Reference Correlations of the Thermal Conductivity of Ethene and Propene

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About