2008
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/8/085403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal expansion behaviour of high performance PEEK matrix composites

Abstract: The thermal expansion behaviour of high performance poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) composites reinforced with micro- (8 µm) and nano- (39 nm) sized Al2O3 particles was studied. The distribution of Al2O3 in the PEEK matrix was studied by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) was reduced from 58 × 10−6 °C−1 for pure PEEK to 22 × 10−6 °C−1 at 43 vol% micro-Al2O3 and to 23 × 10−6 °C−1 at 12 vol% nano-Al2O3 composites. For a given volume fract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy may be accounted for the large surface area to volume ratio of n-Al 2 O 3 filler, which constraint more PEEK matrix fraction, as compared to conventionally used micron size fillers as models are developed for latter. The CTE of the PEEK composite reinforced with 12 vol% micro-Al 2 O 3 (size: 8 lm) was decreased to 37 · 10 À6 /°C [39], which is much higher than that of PEEK reinforced with 12 vol% nano-Al 2 O 3 . For example, for a constant filler loading in a same volume of composite, nanofiller of size 40 nm will have one million times number of nano particles than that of conventionally used filler of 4 lm [40].…”
Section: Coefficient Of Thermal Expansion (Cte)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This discrepancy may be accounted for the large surface area to volume ratio of n-Al 2 O 3 filler, which constraint more PEEK matrix fraction, as compared to conventionally used micron size fillers as models are developed for latter. The CTE of the PEEK composite reinforced with 12 vol% micro-Al 2 O 3 (size: 8 lm) was decreased to 37 · 10 À6 /°C [39], which is much higher than that of PEEK reinforced with 12 vol% nano-Al 2 O 3 . For example, for a constant filler loading in a same volume of composite, nanofiller of size 40 nm will have one million times number of nano particles than that of conventionally used filler of 4 lm [40].…”
Section: Coefficient Of Thermal Expansion (Cte)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…To calculate the D ip between adjacent conducting particles, it was assumed that the particles were homogeneously distributed within the matrix and were perfectly bound to the polymer. From previous work [31], the interparticle distance in the polymer/particle system can be determined by…”
Section: Thermal Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the constraints imposed by the microsized, irregularly shaped AlN particles on the mobility of the polymer chains. 31,32 The glass-transition temperature (T g ) was considered as the meeting point of tangents extrapolated from curves of thermal strain versus temperature. T g increases with increasing AlN content, i.e., from 84°C for pure PPS to 97°C for the 15.1 vol.% composite, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Coefficients Of Thermal Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%