2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal hazard analysis of triacetone triperoxide (TATP) by DSC and GC/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 As a consequence, a large number of detection methods for TATP or HMTD have been developed in the past few years, most of which demand complex instrumentation, including electrochemical, 11,12 indirect fluorescence, 6,[13][14][15][16] and mass spectrometry. 5,[17][18][19][20][21] Examples of readily portable detection methods for field detection of peroxides, however, remain limited and generally require destructive sampling. 22,23 Importantly, a handheld sensor, FIDO-Paxpoint, 24 has been used very recently in US international airports for peroxide detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 As a consequence, a large number of detection methods for TATP or HMTD have been developed in the past few years, most of which demand complex instrumentation, including electrochemical, 11,12 indirect fluorescence, 6,[13][14][15][16] and mass spectrometry. 5,[17][18][19][20][21] Examples of readily portable detection methods for field detection of peroxides, however, remain limited and generally require destructive sampling. 22,23 Importantly, a handheld sensor, FIDO-Paxpoint, 24 has been used very recently in US international airports for peroxide detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accounts for the high temperature sensitivity of NG. According to Table 4, both the Ozawa and Kissinger models [15] give similar values for the activation energies (E a ) of each explosive (NG and PGDN). However, the NG activation energy is lower than that of PGDN; it seems that NG is more sensitive to heat [16].…”
Section: Gcms Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, DSC experiments were performed at heating rates of 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 °C/min, and the test temperature range was set at 30.0–400.0 °C. STAR e software was used to establish thermokinetic models and obtain kinetic parameters 20,21 . The sample sizes of MEA, MEA mixed with CuBr 2 , and MEA mixed with ZnBr 2 were approximately 7.0 mg in each experiment.…”
Section: Experimental and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%