2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal shock behaviour of magnesia–spinel composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] Aksel [36,37] confirmed that the crack propagation parameter R IV is good indicator for a quantitative evaluation of the TSR of refractories containing many volume crack sources. The R ST parameter defines the propagation of inherent, preexisting cracks in a refractories, and crack propagation can be minimized by maximizing the thermal stress crack stability parameter R ST .…”
Section: Thermal Shock Resistance Theoretical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[35] Aksel [36,37] confirmed that the crack propagation parameter R IV is good indicator for a quantitative evaluation of the TSR of refractories containing many volume crack sources. The R ST parameter defines the propagation of inherent, preexisting cracks in a refractories, and crack propagation can be minimized by maximizing the thermal stress crack stability parameter R ST .…”
Section: Thermal Shock Resistance Theoretical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Owing to the nucleation of bubbles and formation of a gas film at the specimen surface, specimens quenched into water at room temperature have variable h values, which may change the heat transfer mechanism as the quench temperature changes [17,23]. In view of the difference between the DT c and R values, a coefficient f(b) has been proposed to modify the thermal shock parameter R as [24][25][26]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the different thermal shock behaviour of alumina and mullite splats (with the latter looking more resistant) must be explained. In literature, formulae like the following are reported for thermal shock resistance evaluation 36 :…”
Section: Thermal Shock Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%