2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(03)00654-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal stability and structure of acicular Fe–Co metal particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XRD revealed similar patterns for the two reduced samples, which correspond to a body-centred-cubic structure assigned to α-Fe (figure 3). The presence of the iron oxide passivation layer in the samples was confirmed by the positions observed for the Fe 2p 3/2 (710.3 eV) and Fe 2p 1/2 (724.0 eV) XPS peaks which, as illustrated for the Fe(Y) 5 sample (figure 4), were consistent with the presence of oxidized iron [20]. Such an oxide phase could not be detected by means of XRD due to a low oxide content and/or to the fact that it normally appears in the form of nanocrystals about 2 nm in size (with a grain size lower than ∼2 nm, diffraction effects are diffuse and close to the background noise).…”
Section: Formation Of Metallic Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…XRD revealed similar patterns for the two reduced samples, which correspond to a body-centred-cubic structure assigned to α-Fe (figure 3). The presence of the iron oxide passivation layer in the samples was confirmed by the positions observed for the Fe 2p 3/2 (710.3 eV) and Fe 2p 1/2 (724.0 eV) XPS peaks which, as illustrated for the Fe(Y) 5 sample (figure 4), were consistent with the presence of oxidized iron [20]. Such an oxide phase could not be detected by means of XRD due to a low oxide content and/or to the fact that it normally appears in the form of nanocrystals about 2 nm in size (with a grain size lower than ∼2 nm, diffraction effects are diffuse and close to the background noise).…”
Section: Formation Of Metallic Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Co alloy (mol%) Fe oxid (mol%) the Fe 2p 3/2 (710.3 eV) and Fe 2p 1/2 (724.0 eV) XPS peak positions observed for all samples were consistent with the presence of oxidized iron in the particle outer layers [21]. The XPS spectra also indicated the presence of oxidized Co(II) in these layers by two broad main peaks at 780.0 and 795.6 eV due to Co 2p 3/2 and Co 2p 1/2 levels, respectively, and two strong associated satellites located at the high binding energy side of the main peaks [22,23].…”
Section: Co Xrf (Mol%)supporting
confidence: 55%