2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/318/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Stability and Surface Wettability Studies of Polylactic Acid/Halloysite Nanotube Nanocomposite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomaterials thermal properties, such as low impedance for neural probes and durability for scaffolds, are crucial to their suitability for neural tissues applications. [ 1,63 ] To determine the thermal properties of PHB and melanin‐PHB scaffolds, we performed a calorimetry study with a differential scanning calorimeter (Section 2.4.4 in the Experimental Section). We observed a negative peak during the heating cycle, corresponding to the melting temperature ( T m ) of the nanofibers, suggesting a deformation in the fiber structure, whereas no peak was observed during the cooling cycle, indicating that the polymer does not further undergo a state change after melting (Figure 3C–E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biomaterials thermal properties, such as low impedance for neural probes and durability for scaffolds, are crucial to their suitability for neural tissues applications. [ 1,63 ] To determine the thermal properties of PHB and melanin‐PHB scaffolds, we performed a calorimetry study with a differential scanning calorimeter (Section 2.4.4 in the Experimental Section). We observed a negative peak during the heating cycle, corresponding to the melting temperature ( T m ) of the nanofibers, suggesting a deformation in the fiber structure, whereas no peak was observed during the cooling cycle, indicating that the polymer does not further undergo a state change after melting (Figure 3C–E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water contact angle is an important parameter to predict the adhesion of cells to the scaffold and is critical to define the its suitability for biological applications. [ 4,63,64 ] Surfaces displaying contact angles lower than 90° are considered hydrophilic. Our findings showed that the value of the contact angles for pure PHB fibers was significantly higher (100.03 ± 1.24°, ** p < 0.0001) than the one of melanin‐PHB scaffolds (61.82 ± 3.40°) (Figure 4E), suggesting that blending of melanin increased the hydrophilicity of the resulting fibers, possibly improving protein adsorption and cell adhesion on the scaffolding surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophilic surfaces are regarded having a contact angle < 90 • , while hydrophobic surfaces ≥ 90 • . The PLA contact angle is 110.10 • [41], classifying it as considerably more hydrophobic than AM with a contact angle of 70 • (Figure 5). The cross-sections of the AM/PLA/CNF (Figure 4e-g) appeared considerably more homogeneous compared to the AM/PLA films, exhibiting no phase separation but rather a rugged structure.…”
Section: Wettability By Water Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the polymer material and the porogen mixed emulsion are added to the mold for evaporative solidification. Finally, residual porogen particles are removed 43–53 . The technology relies on molds and porogens, and different shapes of scaffolds can be constructed using different molds.…”
Section: Pla‐based Scaffold Manufacturing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, some scholars choose to combine low‐temperature freeze‐drying technology to construct scaffolds 45,46 . However, the solvent casting‐particle leaching technique has some limitations, and the size and ratio of porogen particles can easily affect the pore structure inside the scaffold.…”
Section: Pla‐based Scaffold Manufacturing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%