2023
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202300310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Stability Improvement of Cr3+‐Activated Broadband Near‐Infrared Phosphors via State Population Optimization

Abstract: Technological progress has accelerated the researches into broadband near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials as next-generation intelligent NIR light sources; however, poor thermal stability restricts the applications of NIR phosphors. Herein, new insights into Cr 3+ -activated NIR phosphors with improved thermal stability are provided. The photoluminescence intensity originating from the 4T2→4A2 broadband emission of CaLu 2 Al 4 SiO 12 :Cr 3+ (CLAS:Cr) with optimal electron occupation ( 4 T 2 / 2 E) increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the equations, the Dq / B of Cr1 is 2.11 and that of Cr2 is 2.04, demonstrating the weak crystal fields around both Cr 3+ sites ( Dq / B < 2.3), and then producing broadband emission from the 4 T 2g → 4 A 2g transition. 35,36 Generally speaking, the crystal field strength is tetrahedron > octahedron > dodecahedron. 37 Therefore, the crystal field of the Cr1 site stronger than that of Cr2 means that Cr1 comes from the octahedral site [MgO 6 ] and Cr2 locates at the dodecahedral site [Ca/YO 8 ] (Tanabe–Sugano diagram in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the equations, the Dq / B of Cr1 is 2.11 and that of Cr2 is 2.04, demonstrating the weak crystal fields around both Cr 3+ sites ( Dq / B < 2.3), and then producing broadband emission from the 4 T 2g → 4 A 2g transition. 35,36 Generally speaking, the crystal field strength is tetrahedron > octahedron > dodecahedron. 37 Therefore, the crystal field of the Cr1 site stronger than that of Cr2 means that Cr1 comes from the octahedral site [MgO 6 ] and Cr2 locates at the dodecahedral site [Ca/YO 8 ] (Tanabe–Sugano diagram in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37,38] With the doping of Ga 3+ , the crystal field strength decrease and the energy difference between 2 E and 4 T 2 becomes larger, which weakens process 1, therefore, process 3 with a shorter lifetime gradually becomes dominant, and the average lifetime decreased. [39][40][41] The non-radiative transition may also contribute to the lifetime decreases decrease, as shown in Figure 4, with the doping of Ga 3+ , the thermal stability decreased, which is closely related to the increased non-radiative transition. [16] The thermal stability variation will be discussed next part.…”
Section: Enhanced Pl Intensitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The widely adopted strategy to produce broadband NIR luminescence is to select NIR emission centers with large Stokes shifts, which are intrinsically related to the different crystal-field (CF) interactions with the crystalline environment of the excited and ground states. For example, the NIR emission of the octahedrally coordinated Cr 3+ (3d 3 ) ion is due to the 4 T 2 → 4 A 2 transition. The 4 T 2 and 4 A 2 states come from the t 2 2 e 1 and t 2 3 CF configurations, respectively, in which the interactions of the 3d electrons with the crystalline environment are quite different, resulting in distinct equilibrium geometries and hence strongly Stokes-shifted broadband emissions. Likewise, the broadband NIR emission of Sb 3+ /Bi 3+ -containing materials originates from the 3 P 1 → 1 S 0 transition of Sb 3+ /Bi 3+ ; the two states derive from s 1 p 1 and s 2 electron configurations, respectively, interacting differently with the CF environment. , Although the successful realization of the Stokes-shifted broadband NIR luminescence has been reported in numerous materials, there are still limitations to their practical applications regarding their low quantum efficiency and poor thermal stability. This is because the large equilibrium geometry difference between the two states facilitates nonradiative relaxation through a thermally activated crossover from the excited to the ground state. On the other hand, if the excited and ground states derive from the same electron or CF configuration having similar interactions with the crystalline environment, nonradiative relaxation through thermal crossover would be restricted, which would improve their luminescence quantum efficiency and suppress thermal quenching, but simultaneously the emission band would be narrow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%