1997
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.145-149.1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermal Stress Analysis of a PQFP Moulding Process: Comparison of Viscoelastic and Elastic Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the stress levels at the bottom die corner between the two models is plotted in Figure 13. The stress level predicted by the elastic model was more than four times higher than the viscoelastic model, which agreed with the conclusions in our previous study on plastic quad flat pack (PQFP) packages [4]. It is also interesting to note that the extent of stress relaxation in the The accumulated creep strain profiles in the corner solder bump are compared between the two models in Figure 14.…”
Section: Residual Stresses and Creep Strainssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the stress levels at the bottom die corner between the two models is plotted in Figure 13. The stress level predicted by the elastic model was more than four times higher than the viscoelastic model, which agreed with the conclusions in our previous study on plastic quad flat pack (PQFP) packages [4]. It is also interesting to note that the extent of stress relaxation in the The accumulated creep strain profiles in the corner solder bump are compared between the two models in Figure 14.…”
Section: Residual Stresses and Creep Strainssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is shown previously [3][4][5][6][7] that the viscoelastic assumption for polymeric encapsulants made in theoretical studies of electronic packages in general provided better agreement with experimental results obtained from the stress chip measurement than the elastic assumption. Incorrect simplifying assumptions for the material behaviour may often result in erroneous conclusions due to the over-or underestimate of imposed stresses/strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Where 0 the zero-shear-rate viscosity, K * W the critical shear stress, n the power law index, D g the degree of cure at gel point, 1 C and the two fitted constants, A an exponential fitted constant, and b T a temperature-dependent fitted constant. The detail of the flow model could be found in Ref.…”
Section: Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, serious warpage will not proceed to the next manufacture process. In general, different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) values between constitutive materials were considered as the main reasons for warpage [1] [2] [3]. In recent years, there are more evidences showing that it is not sufficient to predict the amount of warpage of IC packages if considering only the CTE value difference between constitutive materials [4] [5] [6] [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fan-out packages, serious warpage will not let the package proceed to the next manufacturing process. In general, different values of the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between the constituent materials are considered as the main reasons for warpage [1]- [3]. In recent years, there has been significant evidence showing that it is not sufficient to predict the amount of warpage of IC packages by considering only the CTE value difference between constituent materials [4]- [6], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%