Abstract. Non-nuclear testing can be a valuable tool in development of a space nuclear power or propulsion system. In a non-nuclear test bed, electric heaters are used to simulate the heat from nuclear fuel. Standard testing allows one to fully assess thermal, heat transfer, and stress related attributes of a given system, but fails to demonstrate the dynamic response that would be present in an integrated, fueled reactor system. The integration of thermal hydraulic hardware tests with simulated neutronic response provides a bridge between electrically heated testing and full nuclear testing. By implementing a neutronic response model to simulate the dynamic response that would be expected in a fueled reactor system, one can better understand system integration issues, characterize integrated system response times and response characteristics, and assess potential design improvements at a relatively small fiscal investment.Initial system dynamic response testing was demonstrated on the integrated SAFE-100a heat pipe cooled, electrically heated reactor and heat exchanger hardware, utilizing a one-group solution to the point kinetics equations to simulate the expected neutronic response of the system (Bragg-Sitton, 2005). Reactivity feedback calculations were then based on a bulk reactivity coeficient and measured average core temperature. Similar dynamic test techniques will be applied to a direct drive gas cooled reactor system (DDG), demonstrating the applicability of the testing methodology to any reactor type and demonstrating the variation in system response characteristics in different reactor concepts. Although both system designs utilize a fast spectrum reactor, the method of cooling the reactor differs significantly, leading to a variable system response that can be demonstrated and assessed in a non-nuclear test facility. DDG testing will utilize a higher fidelity point kinetics model that incorporates the complete six delayed neutron groups to control core power transients. Additionally, reactivity feedback will be based on localized reactivity feedback coefficients and several independent temperature measurements taken within the core block. The neutron generation time and individual temperature feedback coefficients will be provided as model inputs. This paper will discuss the methodology that will be implemented in DDG testing and will assess the additional instrumentation needs to implement high fidelity dynamic testing. Dynamic testing is expected to commence early in FY06.