1992
DOI: 10.2172/87842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermo-mechanical parametric studies of Fixed Mask 1 and Photon Shutter 2 for APS front ends

Abstract: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FM 1 uses an enhanced heat transfer mechanism developed at Argonne National Laboratory, which increases the convective heat transfer coefficient to about 3 W/cm 2 • °C [1 and 8] with single-phase water as the coolant. This enhancement reduces the maximum temperature and the maximum stress in the absorber by about 15 to 25 percent [2] compared to unenhanced, two-dimensional, single-channel absorber geometry with a previously proposed Undulator A [which had a wider x-ray footprint on the face plate because of a larger K (maximum deflection parameter) -2.5 rather than 2.23 of the current Undulator A].…”
Section: Distribution Of This Document Is Unlimitedmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The FM 1 uses an enhanced heat transfer mechanism developed at Argonne National Laboratory, which increases the convective heat transfer coefficient to about 3 W/cm 2 • °C [1 and 8] with single-phase water as the coolant. This enhancement reduces the maximum temperature and the maximum stress in the absorber by about 15 to 25 percent [2] compared to unenhanced, two-dimensional, single-channel absorber geometry with a previously proposed Undulator A [which had a wider x-ray footprint on the face plate because of a larger K (maximum deflection parameter) -2.5 rather than 2.23 of the current Undulator A].…”
Section: Distribution Of This Document Is Unlimitedmentioning
confidence: 92%