2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.22.469619
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Constraints on Electromicrobial Protein Production

Abstract: Global consumption of protein is projected to double by the middle of the 21st century1. However, protein production is one of the most energy intensive and environmentally damaging parts of the food supply system today. Electromicrobial production technologies that combine renewable electricity and CO2-fixing microbial metabolism could dramatically increase the energy efficiency of commodity chemical production2–5. Here we present a molecular-scale model that sets an upper limit on the performance of any orga… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have extended our theoretical framework for calculating the efficiency of EMP ( Salimijazi et al., 2020 ; Wise et al., 2021 ) to calculate the energy cost of lixiviant production from renewable electricity and CO 2 . Full derivations of the equations presented here can be found in the supplement to our original electromicrobial production efficiency theory article ( Salimijazi et al., 2020 ), and in our recent work on the electromicrobial production of protein with extends our theory to calculate the energy (electrical or solar) costs of producing a gram of product ( Wise et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have extended our theoretical framework for calculating the efficiency of EMP ( Salimijazi et al., 2020 ; Wise et al., 2021 ) to calculate the energy cost of lixiviant production from renewable electricity and CO 2 . Full derivations of the equations presented here can be found in the supplement to our original electromicrobial production efficiency theory article ( Salimijazi et al., 2020 ), and in our recent work on the electromicrobial production of protein with extends our theory to calculate the energy (electrical or solar) costs of producing a gram of product ( Wise et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of electricity needed to produce a unit-mass of the lixiviant is, where eν elix is the amount of charge needed to synthesize a single lixiviant molecule from CO 2 (the fundamental charge, e , multiplied by the number of electrons needed for synthesis, ν elix ); Δ U cell is the potential difference across the bio-electrochemical cell; and N A is the Avogadro constant. A derivation of ( Equation 11 ) can be found in Wise et al., 2021 , building upon derivations in Salimijazi et al., 2020 .
Figure 2 Schematic of the electromicrobial production of lixiviants for CO 2 mineralization (A) Single bio-electrochemical cell system where electricity is used to power in vivo CO 2 - and subsequent lixiviant synthesis.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations