2010
DOI: 10.5194/os-6-91-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic properties of sea air

Abstract: Abstract. Very accurate thermodynamic potential functions are available for fluid water, ice, seawater and humid air covering wide ranges of temperature and pressure conditions. They permit the consistent computation of all equilibrium properties as, for example, required for coupled atmosphereocean models or the analysis of observational or experimental data. With the exception of humid air, these potential functions are already formulated as international standards released by the International Association f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(191 reference statements)
2
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proper thermodynamic potential for FREZCHEM is a function which takes chemical potentials rather than particle numbers as independent variables, such as the Landau potential, = pV , where p and V are pressure and volume (Landau and Lifschitz, 1987;Goodstein, 1975). The Landau potential is related to the Gibbs potential by a Legendre transform (Alberty, 2001;Feistel et al, 2010c). The chemical potential of water in seawater expressed in terms of the Gibbs function is an example for such a Legendre transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper thermodynamic potential for FREZCHEM is a function which takes chemical potentials rather than particle numbers as independent variables, such as the Landau potential, = pV , where p and V are pressure and volume (Landau and Lifschitz, 1987;Goodstein, 1975). The Landau potential is related to the Gibbs potential by a Legendre transform (Alberty, 2001;Feistel et al, 2010c). The chemical potential of water in seawater expressed in terms of the Gibbs function is an example for such a Legendre transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the specific Helmholtz energy of humid air, f AV ( A , T , ρ ), as a function of dry-air mass fraction, A , temperature and mass density (IAPWS, 2010; Feistel et al, 2010a). …”
Section: Thermodynamic Equation Of Seawater – 2010 (Teos-10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences can be exactly expressed in terms of the relative fugacity (see Appendix C in the supplement) of water vapour in the atmosphere, which is one of the options for defining relative humidity. To a reasonable approximation, the spatial distribution of the relative fugacity of water vapour can be described by that of the relative humidity in the WMO definition (Erikson, 1965; Kraus, 1972; Hansen and Takahashi, 1984; IOC et al, 2010; Feistel et al, 2010a; Feistel and Ebeling, 2011; Li and Chylek, 2012; Li et al, 2014). At the sea surface, the thermodynamic driving force for evaporation is the difference between the chemical potentials of water in the ocean and in the atmosphere (Kraus and Businger, 1994; IOC et al, 2010).…”
Section: Atmospheric Relative Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a reasonable approximation, see Sec. 5, the spatial distribution of the relative fugacity of water vapour can be described by that of the RH in the standard definition (Erikson, 1965; Kraus, 1972; Hansen and Takahashi, 1984; IOC et al, 2010; Feistel et al, 2010a; Feistel and Ebeling, 2011; Li and Chylek, 2012; Li et al, 2014). At the sea surface, the thermodynamic driving force for evaporation is the difference between the chemical potentials of water in the ocean and in the atmosphere (Kraus and Businger, 1994; IOC et al, 2010).…”
Section: Climatological Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mistake possibly originated in a WMO training manual (Retallack, 1973) and continues to propagate (Gill, 1982; Rogers and Yau, 1989; Pruppacher and Klett, 1997; Katsaros, 2001; Jacobson, 2005; Dai, 2006; Pierrehumbert, 2010), including in some background articles of TEOS-10 (Feistel et al, 2010a, 2010b) and online 11 . On the other hand, ASHRAE (1994) and BS 1339-1 (2002) identify the ratio of mixing ratios, r / r sat , as the “degree of saturation” and “percentage saturation”, respectively, thus clearly distinguishing it from the standard definition.…”
Section: Current Definition and Measurement Practicementioning
confidence: 99%