2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7sm01721a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic signatures and cluster properties of self-assembly in systems with competing interactions

Abstract: Colloidal particles, amphiphiles and functionalized nanoparticles are examples of systems that frequently exhibit short-range attraction coupled with long-range repulsion. We vary the ratio of attraction and repulsion in a simple isotropic model with competing interactions, using molecular simulations, and observe significant differences in the properties of the self-assembled clusters that form. We report conditions that lead to the self-assembly of clusters of a preferred size, accompanied by a change in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In systems with competing interactions the formation of clusters plays an important role in general [26,32,33] as well as in adsorption phenomena as it was demonstrated for a 3D off-lattice system [27]. Thus, the analysis of possible clusters and their distribution in the near wall region can give an additional insight into characterization of the adsorption in our 2D lattice system.…”
Section: Cluster Formationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In systems with competing interactions the formation of clusters plays an important role in general [26,32,33] as well as in adsorption phenomena as it was demonstrated for a 3D off-lattice system [27]. Thus, the analysis of possible clusters and their distribution in the near wall region can give an additional insight into characterization of the adsorption in our 2D lattice system.…”
Section: Cluster Formationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The main result of this work is the "user-friendly" expression for the grand-potential [5,19,20,36], and in the cartoon in Fig.2b. Thus, in the most probable microstates the distribution of the particles is significantly different from the position-independent average volume fraction.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The same form of the SALR potential was previously studied in Refs. [54][55][56][57][58]. The potential has a local minimum for r = 1.141σ, then it crosses zero at r0 = 1.412σ and it has a local maximum for r = 1.886σ.…”
Section: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%