2013
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic studies of a series of homologous HIV-1 TAR RNA ligands reveal that loose binders are stronger Tat competitors than tight ones

Abstract: RNA is a major drug target, but the design of small molecules that modulate RNA function remains a great challenge. In this context, a series of structurally homologous ‘polyamide amino acids’ (PAA) was studied as HIV-1 trans-activating response (TAR) RNA ligands. An extensive thermodynamic study revealed the occurence of an enthalpy–entropy compensation phenomenon resulting in very close TAR affinities for all PAA. However, their binding modes and their ability to compete with the Tat fragment strongly differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As protein-bound RNA molecules can also be highly dynamic ( 30 , 71 ), an alternative approach would be to target instead an entire ensemble of RNA conformations that are fast interconverting, such as the entire set of structures in the ‘open’ partition. This would also result in a lower entropic binding cost, and is consistent with recent observations that so-called ‘loose binders’ of TAR are stronger Tat competitors than tight ones ( 29 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As protein-bound RNA molecules can also be highly dynamic ( 30 , 71 ), an alternative approach would be to target instead an entire ensemble of RNA conformations that are fast interconverting, such as the entire set of structures in the ‘open’ partition. This would also result in a lower entropic binding cost, and is consistent with recent observations that so-called ‘loose binders’ of TAR are stronger Tat competitors than tight ones ( 29 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To account for conformational heterogeneity of the binding site in TAR, conventional computational docking protocols have been modified to dock to entire ensembles rather than using a single binding site structure ( 28 ). Furthermore, there is also evidence that the structural heterogeneity of RNA can extend into the bound state ( 29 , 30 ), resulting in so-called fuzzy complexes ( 31 ). This motivates an ensemble-based drug targeting strategy that explicitly models the thermodynamic effects of flexibility ( 32 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA binding assays included: (i) titrations against fluorescently labeled RNA; (ii) biophysical techniques (SPR and NMR); (iii) microarray immobilization; (iv) in-line probing; (v) competition dialysis and (vi) indicator displacement. We note that a lack of correlation in small molecule activity between in vitro RNA binding and RNA:protein displacement assays has sometimes been reported, ( 16 , 51 , 52 ) highlighting the importance of multiple assays and/or choosing the most relevant assay for a particular system. We also note that, as in all screens, a lack of correlation can be observed between in vitro activity and cell culture activity.…”
Section: Discovery and Design Of Rna-targeted Small Molecule Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, the specificity of all antibiotics showing pre-miRNA binding affinity was measured in the presence of a large excess of tRNA or dsDNA, a methodology that has been largely validated in the literature. [37][38][39] In the first case, the target RNA is placed in the presence of a 100-fold excess of Escherichia coli tRNA (stem-loop structured RNA that account for as much as 15% of the total concentration of intracellular RNA) and the binding of the compound is measured. A specific ratio (K d in the presence of tRNA/K d in the absence of tRNA) can then be calculated.…”
Section: Measurement Of Binding Affinity (Dissociation Constants K D )mentioning
confidence: 99%