2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.045701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamic Study of Simple Molecular Glasses: Universal Features in Their Heat Capacity and the Size of the Cooperatively Rearranging Regions

Abstract: We have obtained some universal thermodynamic properties on glass transitions of molecular liquids. The heat capacity C(p) of glassy propene, which was vitrified by using a vapor-deposition technique, was measured with a newly developed adiabatic calorimeter. Propene has the lowest glass transition temperature (T(g)=56 K), the largest C(p) jump at T(g) (C(p)(lq)/C(p)(gl)~2.5), and the lowest residual entropy (S(res)~Rln2) compared with glass-forming molecules measured before. We have analyzed the present data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Finally, as far as the zero frequency bulk modulus is concerned, we wish to point out that although we have assumed K ∞ − K 0 to be constant and equal to its low temperature limit of ∼0.55 GPa, we can reasonably assume this quantity de-creases smoothly with increasing temperature so that K ∞ (T ) K 0 (T ) + 0.55 GPa (19) and consequently M ∞ (T ) K 0 (T ) + 4 3 G ∞ (T ) + 0.55 GPa. (20) The validity of this upper limit can in principle be checked performing higher frequency scattering experiments such as inelastic x-ray or neutron scattering from which M ∞ (T) is directly measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Finally, as far as the zero frequency bulk modulus is concerned, we wish to point out that although we have assumed K ∞ − K 0 to be constant and equal to its low temperature limit of ∼0.55 GPa, we can reasonably assume this quantity de-creases smoothly with increasing temperature so that K ∞ (T ) K 0 (T ) + 0.55 GPa (19) and consequently M ∞ (T ) K 0 (T ) + 4 3 G ∞ (T ) + 0.55 GPa. (20) The validity of this upper limit can in principle be checked performing higher frequency scattering experiments such as inelastic x-ray or neutron scattering from which M ∞ (T) is directly measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these caveats, the general consensus is that the Adam-Gibbs relation is generally valid in the regime accessed by the simulations. In experiments, which typically analyse temperatures close to T g , the Adam-Gibbs relation seems again to be well obeyed for a range of materials [10,11,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]]. Yet, experiments indicate as well that the Adam-Gibbs relation does not hold anymore above a temperature scale close to T mct [11,28], * ludovic.berthier@umontpellier.fr in stark contrast with the numerical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We compile state-of-the-art experimental 32,34,35 and numerical 16,33 data of S conf , and their extrapolation to low temperatures in Fig. 2.…”
Section: B Why the Configurational Entropy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In calorimetric experiments, the configurational entropy becomes constant below T g upon entering the non- Experimental and numerical determinations of the equilibrium configurational entropy in various models 16,33 and materials. 32,34,35 Data points extracted from vapor deposition experiments 35 are indicated by the ellipse. Both axis are rescaled using the mode-coupling crossover as a reference temperature at which the relaxation time is about 10 −7 s. For hard spheres, the inverse of the reduced pressure, 1/p, replaces temperature.…”
Section: B Why the Configurational Entropy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation