1994
DOI: 10.1021/ja00087a060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of DNA Triplex Formation in Oligomers with and without Cytosine Bases: Influence of Buffer Species, pH, and Sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also included in the table are the parameters exhibited by the interaction between dT 18 and 20 -2(TAT)FE. As previously reported (22,29,30), triplex formation reveals negative ⌬S and ⌬H values, indicating that the process is characterized by an unfavorable entropy change and is, as such, driven by a large negative enthalpy change. Conspicuous differences are, however, observed in the magnitude of the thermodynamic parameters exhibited by the various processes.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Effects Of Flanking Sequences On the Formationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Also included in the table are the parameters exhibited by the interaction between dT 18 and 20 -2(TAT)FE. As previously reported (22,29,30), triplex formation reveals negative ⌬S and ⌬H values, indicating that the process is characterized by an unfavorable entropy change and is, as such, driven by a large negative enthalpy change. Conspicuous differences are, however, observed in the magnitude of the thermodynamic parameters exhibited by the various processes.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Effects Of Flanking Sequences On the Formationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…-2 to -7 kcal/(mol of base). 25 The ∆H i (ionization) of the buffer and the pH used in the experiments influence the observed triplex thermodynamic parameters. Unlike the results with the mixed sequences, the T m values and calorimetric ∆H for triplex formation from the A‚T duplex are independent of pH and buffer species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary difference between many of these triplex models resides in the molecularity of the complex, which in turn influ ences the nature of the duplex and triplex ends. For example, the litera ture contains reports of three-stranded complexes with contiguous dupie x extensions (21,41,110,145,(149)(150)(151)(152) and with so-called blunt ends (52, 60, 104,136,175,184). Other triplex constructs include Wat son-Crick hairpins paired with oligopyrimidine strands (82,133,134,181), an all-pyrimidine hairpin paired with an oligopurine (180), circular oligonucleotides paired with linear oligonucleotides (64), and single stranded intramolecular triplexes (9, 42, 74-77, 109, 119-122, 125-127, 153, 169, 170).…”
Section: Model Oligonucleotide Triple-helix Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these prob lems, inspection of the enthalpy data reveals some patterns that may prove to be general. To be specific, calorimetric studies of oligo(pyri midine) DNA third-strand hybridization with mixing calorimetry (175) and DSC (52, 109, 110, 170) , at or near neutral pH, yield enthalpy values of 2.0-4.2 kcallmol of Hoogsteen-forming nucleotide. Comparisons of these model-independent calorimetric enthalpies with the corresponding model-dependent van't Hoff values under identical conditions re veal that t:J.. HvH is systematically larger than t:J.…”
Section: Temperature Sensitivity Of Triple-helix Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%