2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020ja028969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermodynamics of the Magnetotail Current Sheet Thinning

Abstract: The substorm, one of the main elements of the magnetosphere dynamics, begins with a long-time interval of the magnetic field energy accumulation in the magnetotail current sheet (CS), so-called the substorm growth phase (see, e.g., Baker et al., 1996;Baumjohann, 2002). This accumulation is accompanied by the CS thinning (the increase of the equatorial current density), the stretching of magnetotail filed lines, and the evolution of plasma characteristics. The growth phase is assumed to be terminated by the sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main signatures of the current sheet thinning are a decrease of the equatorial magnetic field B z (hereinafter Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric (GSM) coordinates are used), an increase of the equatorial current density j y , and a less‐pronounced increase of the lobe magnetic field B L (see, e.g., Birn et al., 1998; Schindler & Birn, 1982, 1993). These signatures are quite repeatable and well‐documented by a number of authors using past single and more recent multi‐spacecraft missions (Artemyev, Angelopoulos, Runov, & Petrukovich, 2016; Petrukovich et al., 2007; Sergeev et al., 2011; Snekvik et al., 2012; Yushkov et al., 2021). Simulations using magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) analytical models (e.g., Birn et al., 2004), numerical 3D MHD (e.g., Gordeev et al., 2017; Hsieh & Otto, 2015), hybrid (Lu, Artemyev, Angelopoulos, Lin, et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2016) and particle‐in‐cell (e.g., Lu et al., 2018) approaches also reproduce these signatures rather faithfully.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The main signatures of the current sheet thinning are a decrease of the equatorial magnetic field B z (hereinafter Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric (GSM) coordinates are used), an increase of the equatorial current density j y , and a less‐pronounced increase of the lobe magnetic field B L (see, e.g., Birn et al., 1998; Schindler & Birn, 1982, 1993). These signatures are quite repeatable and well‐documented by a number of authors using past single and more recent multi‐spacecraft missions (Artemyev, Angelopoulos, Runov, & Petrukovich, 2016; Petrukovich et al., 2007; Sergeev et al., 2011; Snekvik et al., 2012; Yushkov et al., 2021). Simulations using magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) analytical models (e.g., Birn et al., 2004), numerical 3D MHD (e.g., Gordeev et al., 2017; Hsieh & Otto, 2015), hybrid (Lu, Artemyev, Angelopoulos, Lin, et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2016) and particle‐in‐cell (e.g., Lu et al., 2018) approaches also reproduce these signatures rather faithfully.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It is accompanied by an increase in the total pressure of the plasma sheet, which is mainly caused by an increase in the plasma density (e.g., Nagai et al., 1997). However, it is not simply caused by any pressure balance effect (e.g., Saito et al., 2011; Sergeev et al., 2011; Yushkov et al., 2021), and plasma transport processes should operate (e.g., Hsieh & Otto, 2015). Since it is difficult to sample many plasma flows during the pure growth phase (not affected by previous substorm activities) by spacecraft in the plasma sheet, the plasma flow pattern producing the dynamics during the growth phase is not well explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us discuss ranges of these parameters derived from spacecraft observations in the near-Earth magnetotail. The current sheet thickness L z varies from 500 km to 5000 km for most of observed magnetotail current sheets 9,27 , and L z is larger for post-dipolarization current sheet 53 . The dipolarization front thickness L x is generally smaller than 1000 km (see Refs.…”
Section: Charged Particle Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 96%