1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(94)00156-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelastic deformations of masks for deep X-ray lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. A significant weight loss is observed at dose values above 0.26 kJ/cm 3 weight loss even after developing times of more than 26 days. Therefore this dose value is defined in this article as the minimum dose necessary to observe a significant resist attack.…”
Section: Dissolution Ratesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3. A significant weight loss is observed at dose values above 0.26 kJ/cm 3 weight loss even after developing times of more than 26 days. Therefore this dose value is defined in this article as the minimum dose necessary to observe a significant resist attack.…”
Section: Dissolution Ratesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2 Structure displacements of 0.2 m were observed at DCI/LURE using x-ray masks fabricated on top of a 500 m thick Be membrane due to thermal heat load. 3 Fluorescence radiation produced within a Ti mask membrane may lead to a rounding at the top layer of the resist of thickness up to 200 m. 4 These defects and structure limits become visible after the development of irradiated resist samples. As a consequence, the influence of irradiation conditions and the developing process cannot be separated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these are: diffraction effects at the absorber edges, dose deposition by secondary electron and radiation processes, divergence of synchrotron radiation, elastic and inelastic photon scattering, and heat load on mask 8 and thermoplastic deformation of the mask during irradiation. 11 They demonstrated that the lateral degradation of those effects in the energy range usually considered for deep x-ray lithography ͑2-8 keV͒ in a medium size microstructure gives maximum contributions in the submicrometer range. Thus, this physics' approach failed to account for micrometer-scale degradation of the developed patterns as observed by a few groups.…”
Section: B Deep X-ray Lithography Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite-element calculations showed that the deviations from the ideal shadow print can be kept below 0.2 µm (for 500 µm thick resist layers and 1.6 W cm −2 radiation power) if beryllium or diamond are used as mask membrane materials. The thermoelastic deformations were investigated earlier [3] and will not be addressed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%