2013
DOI: 10.1080/17686733.2013.800688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelastic stress analysis with a compact low-cost microbolometer system

Abstract: This article describes the development and validation of a novel thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) system based on a low-cost microbolometer device. The use of a microbolometer for a highly synchronous and delicate temperature measurement breaks a longstanding and exclusive reliance on high performance, cooled photon detectors for thermoelastic applications. It is shown that despite markedly inferior noise equivalent temperature detectivity and dynamic response specifications, microbolometers are capable of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although much less costly and more practical, thermal detectors have a relatively slow dynamic response and a poor sensitivity compared to cooled photon detectors, factors that were assumed to militate against their use for TSA which entails the measurement of rapidly fluctuating temperature variations of around 1 mK in amplitude. This view began to change in 2005 when experimental testing of the first TSA system developed using a thermal detector demonstrated levels of stress-measurement performance that were far better than what might have been expected [3]. Indeed, given sufficient "observation" time the thermal detector was able to consistently outperform a significantly more sensitive 1 cooled detector applied under the same circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although much less costly and more practical, thermal detectors have a relatively slow dynamic response and a poor sensitivity compared to cooled photon detectors, factors that were assumed to militate against their use for TSA which entails the measurement of rapidly fluctuating temperature variations of around 1 mK in amplitude. This view began to change in 2005 when experimental testing of the first TSA system developed using a thermal detector demonstrated levels of stress-measurement performance that were far better than what might have been expected [3]. Indeed, given sufficient "observation" time the thermal detector was able to consistently outperform a significantly more sensitive 1 cooled detector applied under the same circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This board provides a more readily accessible hardware interface and includes a 3.3V regulated voltage supply to power the core. The LVDS signal was converted to a Gigabit Ethernet (GigE) stream using a Pleora iPORT PT1000LV frame grabber and then fed into a standard notebook computer where it was de-serialized and then cross-correlated against a reference signal using the MiTE (Microbolometer Thermoelastic Evaluation) software [3]. The process is shown schematically in Figure 4.…”
Section: Proof Of Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, an InSb photon detector has a time constant in the order of micro or even nano seconds. In addition, the Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference (NETD) can be up to three times higher [6].…”
Section: Fig 2 Lwir Image Registered On Top Of a Vis Hd Video Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many practical cases the dominant frequency is on the order of 1 Hz. Therefore, studying fire phenomena using infrared themography allows for slower IR systems as opposed to, for instance, thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) [6]. While Eq.…”
Section: Fig 2 Lwir Image Registered On Top Of a Vis Hd Video Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high capital-cost disadvantage of TSA no longer applies following a recent finding that low-cost automation grade thermal detectors can provide comparable stress sensitivities to cryogenically cooled photon detectors (Nick Rajic & Rowlands 2013;Rajic N., Weinberg S. & D. 2007). Thermal detectors are generally far less expensive, much smaller, have better tolerance to shock and vibration and consume less power than their photon-detector counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%