2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2006.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelectric properties of the new tellurides SrSc2Te4 and BaSc2Te4 in comparison to BaY2Te4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the Sc–Te distance of 2.946(1) Å in the NaScTe 2 structure is longer than that of NaScSe 2 due to the larger size of Te than Se. The observed Sc–Te distance compares well with those found in SrSc 2 Te 4 (2.8917(12)–2.9764(19) Å), 6 RbSc 5 Te 8 (2.843(2)–3.034(2) Å), 29 and TlScTe 2 (2.9341(6) Å). 53 The NaTe 6 also has almost regular octahedron geometry with six identical Na–Te interactions of 3.218(1) Å that is in concordance with the Na–Te distances of the related NaCuZrTe 3 (3.168(15)–3.244(15) Å) 54 and NaMn 1.56 Te 2 (3.255(2) Å) structures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As expected, the Sc–Te distance of 2.946(1) Å in the NaScTe 2 structure is longer than that of NaScSe 2 due to the larger size of Te than Se. The observed Sc–Te distance compares well with those found in SrSc 2 Te 4 (2.8917(12)–2.9764(19) Å), 6 RbSc 5 Te 8 (2.843(2)–3.034(2) Å), 29 and TlScTe 2 (2.9341(6) Å). 53 The NaTe 6 also has almost regular octahedron geometry with six identical Na–Te interactions of 3.218(1) Å that is in concordance with the Na–Te distances of the related NaCuZrTe 3 (3.168(15)–3.244(15) Å) 54 and NaMn 1.56 Te 2 (3.255(2) Å) structures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Te–Sc–Te angles of these octahedra are also very close to those of the ideal octahedron with m –3 m symmetry (Table ). A comparison of the Sc–Te distances in Ba 3 ScTe 5 with the corresponding distances found in the related structures such as BaSc 2 Te 4 [2.878(2)–2.958(1) Å], SrSc 2 Te 4 [2.892(1)–2.977(1) Å], RbSc 5 Te 8 [2.890(1)–2.926(1) Å], and TlScTe 2 [2.9341(6) Å] reveals good agreement with the single Sc 3+ –Te bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of face-sharing, the Sc···Sc distances are expected to be shorter than those in related structures that have edge-sharing or corner-sharing units of Sc octahedra. Indeed, the Sc···Sc interactions of 3.4167(1) Å in Ba 3 ScTe 5 are shorter compared with those in TlScTe 2 [4.2128(4) Å], BaSc 2 Te 4 [4.2692(1) Å], and CsCu 2 Sc 3 Te 6 [4.0430(1) Å] that have edge-shared ScTe 6 octahedra. Only RbSc 5 Te 8 shows a Sc···Sc interaction of 3.6590(1) Å, which is closer to the corresponding interactions in Ba 3 ScTe 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations