2017
DOI: 10.1615/annualrevheattransfer.2018019042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermophysical Phenomena in Metal Additive Manufacturing by Selective Laser Melting: Fundamentals, Modeling, Simulation, and Experimentation

Abstract: Among the many additive manufacturing (AM) processes for metallic materials, selective laser melting (SLM) is arguably the most versatile in terms of its potential to realize complex geometries along with tailored microstructure. However, the complexity of the SLM process, and the need for predictive relation of powder and process parameters to the part properties, demands further development of computational and experimental methods. This review addresses the fundamental physical phenomena of SLM, with a spec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(392 reference statements)
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the laser beam is shone over the powders, solidification structures such as cells or dendrites are formed in fine and anisotropic microstructures due to the high scanning speeds and small melt pools [51]. Altogether, the particle morphology, particle size distribution, and voids between the powders affect the absorption, reflection, and penetration of the laser radiation [52][53][54]. Consequently, the characteristics of the powder are related to the shape of melt pools and lattice structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the laser beam is shone over the powders, solidification structures such as cells or dendrites are formed in fine and anisotropic microstructures due to the high scanning speeds and small melt pools [51]. Altogether, the particle morphology, particle size distribution, and voids between the powders affect the absorption, reflection, and penetration of the laser radiation [52][53][54]. Consequently, the characteristics of the powder are related to the shape of melt pools and lattice structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the laser or electron beams are shone over the powders, they may be absorbed or reflected due to the spaces and voids between the powders. There are multiple reflections of light off the powder particle surfaces as each particle acts as a spherical mirror that is not perfectly shiny, which provides some absorptivity; in addition the laser penetration is under the influence of powder packing [ 32 ]. After accomplishing the scanning of the current layer, then the recoater feeds a thin layer of powders on the top of the solidified layer and the process is repeated until the desired 3D part is achieved [ 33 ].…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLM-made part’s quality is significantly under the influence of three key parameters–laser/material interaction, heat transfer and fluid dynamics of the melt pool as well as flow of vapor and gas over the build area. Melt pool geometry and stability affects the grain growth and microstructure [ 32 ]. As the laser beam moves over the powder bed, the melt pool is elongated behind it and extended a bit in front of the laser, and due to the dependence of surface tension over the melt pool on temperature, causes the melt pool to be non uniform.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, as manufacturing constraints are geometry-dependent [43], components with different geometries have different active AM constraints in their function model (FM) trees.…”
Section: Inactive and Externally Dominated (Iie)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive manufacturing powder bed processes are based on complex physical phenomena, and AM manufacturing constraints are largely geometry dependent [43]. For this reason, each manufacturing constraint obtained from the literature must be evaluated for the product geometry of interest.…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%