2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2789(01)00284-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermosolutal and binary fluid convection as a 2×2 matrix problem

Abstract: We describe an interpretation of convection in binary fluid mixtures as a superposition of thermal and solutal problems, with coupling due to advection and proportional to the separation parameter S. Many of the properties of binary fluid convection are then consequences of generic properties of 2 × 2 matrices. The eigenvalues of 2 × 2 matrices varying continuously with a parameter r undergo either avoided crossing or complex coalescence, depending on the sign of the coupling (product of off-diagonal terms). W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Im͑͒ decreases to zero, the pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues splits into two real eigenvalues, which correspond to the transcritical and pitchfork modes before coalescence. This whole coalescence and splitting process is similar to the situation of a 2 ϫ 2 matrix problem studied by Tuckerman 22 and the Marangoni convection in binary mixtures studied by Bergeon et al 23 It is interesting to note that before coalescence the most unstable mode is transcritical, while after splitting the most unstable mode is pitchfork. In the case of a closed cavity, these two steady modes simply cross at a codimension-two point and near this point no new dynamical behavior is observed.…”
Section: Variations Of Leading Eigenvalues With Grsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…When Im͑͒ decreases to zero, the pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues splits into two real eigenvalues, which correspond to the transcritical and pitchfork modes before coalescence. This whole coalescence and splitting process is similar to the situation of a 2 ϫ 2 matrix problem studied by Tuckerman 22 and the Marangoni convection in binary mixtures studied by Bergeon et al 23 It is interesting to note that before coalescence the most unstable mode is transcritical, while after splitting the most unstable mode is pitchfork. In the case of a closed cavity, these two steady modes simply cross at a codimension-two point and near this point no new dynamical behavior is observed.…”
Section: Variations Of Leading Eigenvalues With Grsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…One of the emerging real eigenvalues keeps increasing with Re while the other one decreases, producing a steady subcritical bifurcation responsible for the existence of subcritical steady flow branches. 30,33 Unfortunately this scenario does not hold here, at least in the range of Re values investigated ͓Fig. 2͑a͔͒.…”
Section: B Steady Flow Regimementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Swirling has a dramatic destabilizing effect, since the critical Reynolds number decreases by approximately 85 %, from Re = 300 at S = 0.845 to Re = 40.5 at S = 1.8. Note the distortions of the m = −1 neutral curve close to the value S = 1.05, caused by the avoided crossing of two eigenvalues (Tuckerman 2001). This phenomenon is best seen in figure 4(b) showing the evolution of the two largest m = −1 growth rates when increasing the swirl and keeping the Reynolds number constant (Re = 164, i.e.…”
Section: Mode Selection At the Threshold Of Helical Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%