2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theta dominates cross-frequency coupling in hippocampal-medial entorhinal circuit during awake-behavior in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo , excitatory inputs from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus are most coherent in the theta band, while gamma oscillations would be generated locally from presumed local inhibitory inputs (Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014 ). This predominance of theta over gamma coherence has also been reported between hippocampal CA1 and the medial entorhinal cortex (Zhou et al, 2022 ). Another potential pitfall in the communication-through-coherence hypothesis is that theta oscillations harmonics could overlap with higher frequency bands (Czurkó et al, 1999 ; Terrazas et al, 2005 ) including slow gamma (Petersen and Buzsáki, 2020 ).…”
Section: Gamma Oscillations Could Facilitate Communication Between Pr...supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In vivo , excitatory inputs from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus are most coherent in the theta band, while gamma oscillations would be generated locally from presumed local inhibitory inputs (Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014 ). This predominance of theta over gamma coherence has also been reported between hippocampal CA1 and the medial entorhinal cortex (Zhou et al, 2022 ). Another potential pitfall in the communication-through-coherence hypothesis is that theta oscillations harmonics could overlap with higher frequency bands (Czurkó et al, 1999 ; Terrazas et al, 2005 ) including slow gamma (Petersen and Buzsáki, 2020 ).…”
Section: Gamma Oscillations Could Facilitate Communication Between Pr...supporting
confidence: 73%
“…As gamma is local, it should be considered that any “cross-regional correlation” in frequency has more to do with the common theta drive than frequency-specific communication ( Pernía-Andrade and Jonas, 2014 ; Ray and Maunsell, 2015 ). Gamma is the reverberatory consequence of common theta drive ( Mizuseki et al, 2009 ; Zhou et al, 2022 ). Future research should work toward understanding how the dynamic process of forming patterns within and propagating across regions supports higher cognitive functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zhou et al (2022) found there is little evidence of crossregional gamma-phase synchrony between MEC and HPC, suggesting local gamma oscillations are generated by interregional theta-inputs and local interneurons, rather than directly receiving interregional gamma-inputs (Zhou et al, 2022). The contribution of other interneuron cell-types for oscillatory generation is less known, while different types of interneurons fire at different timing of local oscillations (Klausberger & Somogyi, 2008;Valero & de la Prida, 2018).…”
Section: Cell-t Ype-s Pecifi C Oscill Atory Communi C Ati On In Mec-hp Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These oscillatory activities are thought to be generated by inhibitory networks, especially PV + cells are considered to play key role and SOM + cells are important for gamma and ripple oscillations (Amilhon et al, 2015; Bartos et al, 2007; Bezaire et al, 2016; Buzsaki, 2015; Buzsaki & Wang, 2012; Korotkova et al, 2010; Royer et al, 2012; Schlingloff et al, 2014; Stark et al, 2014). Recently, Zhou et al (2022) found there is little evidence of cross‐regional gamma‐phase synchrony between MEC and HPC, suggesting local gamma oscillations are generated by interregional theta‐inputs and local interneurons, rather than directly receiving interregional gamma‐inputs (Zhou et al, 2022). The contribution of other interneuron cell‐types for oscillatory generation is less known, while different types of interneurons fire at different timing of local oscillations (Klausberger & Somogyi, 2008; Valero & de la Prida, 2018).…”
Section: Cell‐type‐specific Oscillatory Communication In Mec‐hpcmentioning
confidence: 99%