2020
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Think Before They Squeak: Vocalizations of the Squirrel Family

Abstract: Squirrels (Sciuridae) are a diverse group in behavior, morphology, and ecology. This variation is typified by the wide range of vocalizations spanning ground squirrels (Marmotini and Xerini), tree squirrels (Callosciurinae and Sciurini), and flying squirrels (Pteromyini). Squirrels produce calls that range in frequency, modulation, and function, with a complex set of social calls occurring across the family. We review the history of recording methods used in the development of squirrel vocalization repertoires… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences, however, disappeared when variables were corrected for body size; the southern population, with smaller body sizes, had calls with shorter duration, time to the maximum amplitude, and higher fundamental and dominant frequencies than the central population. The negative relationship between call frequencies and body size is similar to previous reports for different types of vocalization across taxa (Birds: Friis et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2011;Ryan & Brenowitz, 1985;Amphibians: Gingras et al, 2013;Tonini et al, 2020;Wilczynski et al, 1993;Crocodiles: Vergne et al, 2012;Mammals: Bowling et al, 2017;Newar & Bowman, 2020;Geckos: Rohtla Jr et al, 2019). It is not surprising this negative relation, considering that typically, larger animals have larger structures that result in the production of lower frequencies (Fletcher, 2004;Bowling et al, 2017;see Riondato et al, 2021 for an exception).…”
Section: Distress Callssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These differences, however, disappeared when variables were corrected for body size; the southern population, with smaller body sizes, had calls with shorter duration, time to the maximum amplitude, and higher fundamental and dominant frequencies than the central population. The negative relationship between call frequencies and body size is similar to previous reports for different types of vocalization across taxa (Birds: Friis et al, 2021;Martin et al, 2011;Ryan & Brenowitz, 1985;Amphibians: Gingras et al, 2013;Tonini et al, 2020;Wilczynski et al, 1993;Crocodiles: Vergne et al, 2012;Mammals: Bowling et al, 2017;Newar & Bowman, 2020;Geckos: Rohtla Jr et al, 2019). It is not surprising this negative relation, considering that typically, larger animals have larger structures that result in the production of lower frequencies (Fletcher, 2004;Bowling et al, 2017;see Riondato et al, 2021 for an exception).…”
Section: Distress Callssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The more complex USVs, such as harmonic call types, are associated with sex behaviors, group housing, juvenile play, and other pleasurable behaviors (e.g., tickling) [50][51][52][53][54]. Larger USV bandwidths are associated with communicating to other rodents further away, indicating that the higher bandwidth may be used to compensate in a more expansive environment [55]. In addition to 50 kHz USVs, rodents vocalize at 22 kHz USVs under stressful of aversive conditions [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic structure of "kuk" sounds by the Japanese squirrel was similar to that of the chirp or the seet call of Tamiasciurus hudsonicus (Smith 1978;Greene and Meagher 1998). Newar and Bowman (2020), who examined the acoustic characteristics of 73 squirrel species, found that the fundamental frequency of sounds increased with decreasing body size. Smaller Japanese squirrels tended to produce a higher frequency "kuk" sound than other larger Sciurus species, which may be due to physical body size constraints (Fitch 2006;Newar and Bowman 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%