Background Conservation practitioners are often interested in developing land use plans that increase landscape connectivity, which is defined as the degree to which the landscape facilitates or impedes movement among resource patches. Landscape connectivity is often estimated with a cost surface that indicates the varying costs experienced by an organism in moving across a landscape. True, or absolute costs are rarely known however, and therefore assigning costs to different landscape elements is often a challenge in creating cost surface maps. As such, we consider it important to understand the sensitivity of connectivity estimates to uncertainty in cost estimates. Methods We used simulated landscapes to test the sensitivity of current density estimates from circuit theory to varying relative cost values, fragmentation, and number of cost classes (i.e., thematic resolution). Current density is proportional to the probability of use during a random walk. Using Circuitscape software, we simulated electrical current between pairs of nodes to create current density maps. We then measured the correlation of the current density values across scenarios. Results In general, we found that cost values were highly correlated across scenarios with different cost weights (mean correlation ranged from 0.87 to 0.92). Changing the spatial configuration of landscape elements by varying the degree of fragmentation reduced correlation in current density across maps. We also found that correlations were more variable when the range of cost values in a map was high. Discussion The low sensitivity of current density estimates to relative cost weights suggests that the measure may be reliable for land use applications even when there is uncertainty about absolute cost values, provided that the user has the costs correctly ranked. This finding should facilitate the use of cost surfaces by conservation practitioners interested in estimating connectivity and planning linkages and corridors.
Squirrels (Sciuridae) are a diverse group in behavior, morphology, and ecology. This variation is typified by the wide range of vocalizations spanning ground squirrels (Marmotini and Xerini), tree squirrels (Callosciurinae and Sciurini), and flying squirrels (Pteromyini). Squirrels produce calls that range in frequency, modulation, and function, with a complex set of social calls occurring across the family. We review the history of recording methods used in the development of squirrel vocalization repertoires, with emphasis on how the ecology and methodology impact the frequency values reported. The fundamental (F 0 -the mean frequency of the fundamental harmonic), dominant (F Dom -the frequency of maximum energy or amplitude), minimum (F Min -the minimum frequency of the fundamental harmonic), maximum (F Max -the maximum frequency of the dominant harmonic), and highest harmonic (F Harm -the mean frequency of the highest visible harmonic) frequencies were considered against popular hypotheses that have attempted to explain the evolution of vocal frequency characteristics in terrestrial mammals. These hypotheses include body size, predator avoidance, habitat type, and diel activity pattern. Phylogenetic generalized least squared modeling revealed that body mass and the frequency limits of the methods were the strongest drivers of high-frequency communication. Consistent with popular hypotheses, social squirrels exhibited a broader range of F 0 , F Dom , and F Max than solitary squirrels while habitat openness promoted higher F Dom and F Harm . Additionally, nocturnality was significantly associated with higher F 0 , F Dom , and F Max , suggesting that flying squirrels, the only nocturnal squirrels, commonly use high-frequency acoustic signals, a finding that merits further investigation. In conclusion, our review provides a unique insight into the role of behavioral ecology on vocal repertoires and the importance of accurate equipment selection for sampling across a diverse taxon.
Competition is a driving factor in shaping ecological communities and may act directly or indirectly through apparent competition. We examined a classic example of parasite-mediated competition between northern ( Glaucomys sabrinus ) and southern flying squirrels ( G. volans ) via the intestinal nematode, Strongyloides robustus, and tested whether it could act as a species barrier in a flying squirrel hybrid zone. We live-trapped flying squirrels ( G. sabrinus and G. volans ), grey squirrels ( Sciurus carolinensis ), red squirrels ( Tamiasciurus hudsonicus ), and chipmunks ( Tamias striatus ) from June–September 2019 at 30 woodlots in Ontario, Canada. Fecal samples from squirrels were collected and analyzed for the presence of endoparasite eggs. For each individual, we calculated Scaled Mass Index (SMI) as a measure of body condition to assess the effect of S. robustus on squirrels. We found eggs of S. robustus in all species except chipmunks. Infection with S. robustus did not appear to affect body condition of southern flying squirrels and grey squirrels, but we did find a weak negative effect on northern flying squirrels and red squirrels. Despite a weak asymmetric effect of S. robustus on flying squirrels, we did not find any evidence that parasite-mediated competition could lead to competitive exclusion from woodlots. Furthermore, S. robustus eggs were common in feces of the red squirrel, a species largely sympatric with northern flying squirrel.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.