Think rich, feel hurt: the critique of capitalism and the production of affect in the making of financial subjects in South Korea

Abstract

This article describes the process of financial subjectification by observing a private educational programme on financial self-management in South Korea. 'Wealth-tech' is a popular Korean term that refers to techniques of personal finance and money-management. Ethnographic research on a private educational programme on the subject of wealth-tech brings to light justifying mechanisms of financial investments and moral foundations for the pursuit of wealth whereby laypeople's engagement with, and attachment to, financial markets are (re-)vitalized. In particular, this study highlights the role of critiques about capitalism as well as the production of affect in the making of financial subjects. By re-appropriating critiques of capitalism and employing therapeutic narratives, the wealth-tech pedagogy redefines financial investment as an act of resistance against the ills of capitalism and foreign capital. Moreover, this case study shows that wealth-tech is legitimized not solely by risk calculations per se, but also by feelings of hurt. Participants tend to transform themselves into active wealth-tech practitioners by cultivating the kind of affect that I call here 'thinking rich, feeling hurt'. Therefore, the financial subjects configured in this wealth-tech pedagogy are those who feel hurt, and in this emotive state are led to think from the perspective of the rich. Moreover, they are configured not only as selfgoverning individuals but also as collective beings who resist foreign capital through their own engagement with financial markets. In this process of financial subjectification, the beliefs that finance can make them rich become consolidated. By illustrating these Korean experiences, this article calls attention to critical and affective practices in the process of financial subjectification, in particular those that take shape at the encounter between market rationality and ordinary experiences, memories, and feelings whereby laypeople translate discourses and techniques of financial capitalism into their own values and judgments. KEYWORDS Wealth-tech; financial subject; financial self-help; critique of capitalism; affect; South Korea This study explores private pedagogy related to financial self-management (wealth-tech) in South Korea, with a focus on the role that critiques and affect play in its production of financial subjects. As finance has become

The financialization of anti-capitalism? The case of the ‘Financial Independence Retire Early’ community

“…Instead it justifies itself through a critique of heteronomy, of work under certain conditions and to certain ends. Financial investment becomes an act of awakened resistance that draws on such critiques, and FIRE massages these feelings of exploitation and indignation as part of its affective draw (Kim 2017).…”

The ecosystem of a ‘wealth-tech’ culture: the birth of networked financial subjects in South Korea

“…Drawing upon ethnographic data, three widespread practices were identified as central to the formation of the ecosystem and its subjects: gifting of financial information; blending of laity and expertise; and reappropriating a financial community into a kind of ‘third place’ (Oldenburg, 1991), described as an informal public place hosting sociable conversations. Building on my previous work that shows how wealth-tech enthusiasts were formed as financial subjects (Kim, 2017), I define the new form of subjectivity constructed through such practices as the networked financial subject , and argue that this subject exhibits a distinctive mode of selfhood informed by both financial subjects – self-governing subjects who take responsibility for their own financial well-being and manage themselves in accordance with norms of the financial market – and neoliberal networked subjects – subjects who engage in sharing and online social networking in consonance with neoliberal governmentality.…”

“…As he himself became a wealth-tech celebrity, however, he quit his job and began to offer an in-person seminar entitled ‘Ten in Ten Academy’. Made up of five weekly 3-hour lectures and after-parties, the seminar covered how to become rich and why wealth-tech is necessary, as well as financial literacy and ‘Investment 101’ (Kim, 2017). More than 15,000 people took this program while its enrollment fee increased from around US$90 (2012) to US$180 (as of 2018).…”

Against Three “Cultural” Characters Speaks Self‐Improvement: Social Critique and Desires for “Modernity” in Pedagogies of Soft Skills in Contemporary China

“…Practices of "self-improvement" often endeavor to habituate behaviors and values consistent with wider cultural systems. In China, anthropologists in the last two decades have discerned new market-driven forms of self-cultivation as evidence for the penetration of self-reliant and individualistic subject positions (e.g., Hoffman 2010;Otis 2011;Yan 2008;Yan 2013;Yang 2015;Zhang 2017), much like the situation in other economically changing societies (see Cahn 2008;Dunn 2014;Gooptu 2016;Kim 2016;Rudnyckyj 2011). This phenomenon is notable in Chinese public education where policymakers and educators increasingly regard person-centered qualities as beneficial for the healthy growth of children as well as conducive to market productivity (Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the State Council 1999; Kuan 2015;Naftali 2014;Woronov 2003).…”