2016
DOI: 10.1215/22011919-3616371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking About Inheritance Through the Figure of the Anthropocene, from the Antipodes and in the Presence of Others

Abstract: Modes of thinking matter. In this article we engage with the figure of the Anthropocene as the impetus for rethinking the messy environmental legacies of Australian settler colonialism that we have inherited. We do this rethinking in a small rural valley community, where the intractable realities of human and more than human settler colonial relations are played out on a daily basis. We also try to do this rethinking collectively, in the presence of other animals with whom our inherited pasts, our mundane ever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encounters ‘seize thought’ and ‘unravel the unity of the faculties’ and it is only through keeping hold of their ‘radically ungrounding effects’ that we can begin to challenge species hierarchies and our most familiar way of knowing (Todd and Hynes, 2017: 733). For Todd and Hynes (2017), encounters are not just an event of difference but an event of ‘difference in thought ’ (730; see also Derrida, 2008; Instone and Taylor, 2016). Here we move away from understanding difference as something that is empirically recognizable to instead consider immanent potential and forms of becoming.…”
Section: Decipherability and The Question Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encounters ‘seize thought’ and ‘unravel the unity of the faculties’ and it is only through keeping hold of their ‘radically ungrounding effects’ that we can begin to challenge species hierarchies and our most familiar way of knowing (Todd and Hynes, 2017: 733). For Todd and Hynes (2017), encounters are not just an event of difference but an event of ‘difference in thought ’ (730; see also Derrida, 2008; Instone and Taylor, 2016). Here we move away from understanding difference as something that is empirically recognizable to instead consider immanent potential and forms of becoming.…”
Section: Decipherability and The Question Of Voicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often related to as a signal for an uncertain ecological future precipitated by humankind's use of and exploitation of natural resources. The term Anthropocene itself is problematic given the etymology of the word (-anthropo meaning 'human' and -cene meaning 'new') and the risk of further validating human exceptionalism is a common theme within the debates (Instone & Taylor, 2015;Taylor, 2017). The discipline of early childhood education is often critiqued for its Anthropocentric focus, perhaps resultant from this long history of romantic entanglements of child and nature (e.g., Rousseau, Fröebel) (Duhn, 2012).…”
Section: Challenging Naiveté -Child and Nature Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…seek to both 'decolonise' the discourse of the anthropocenologists, and to flag the colonial histories and presents of environmental degradation (see Todd, 2016;Instone and Taylor, 2015;Collard et al, 2014;Sundberg, 2014).…”
Section: Ideological Provocationmentioning
confidence: 99%