2011
DOI: 10.1080/14681811.2011.590065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thinking outside specious boxes: constructionist and post-structuralist readings of ‘child sexual abuse’

Abstract: Contemporary western understandings of 'childhood' reflect (adult) cultural projections of children as (sexually) innocent, vulnerable beings. In this paper, I examine how projections of children and their 'sexual culture' are maintained and reproduced through child sexual abuse therapy in North America. I argue that such specious frameworks pose conceptual problems for exploring how children interpret their sexual experiences. Seeing that research involving direct contact with children has been rendered pract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 For examples of such perspectives, see Smith’s (2007) study of the pleasures of reading women’s porn, Holland and Attwood’s (2009) discussion of the mainstreaming of pole dancing, and Thompson’s (2010) and Grondin’s (2011) analyses of contemporary ‘moral panics’ around child sexual abuse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 For examples of such perspectives, see Smith’s (2007) study of the pleasures of reading women’s porn, Holland and Attwood’s (2009) discussion of the mainstreaming of pole dancing, and Thompson’s (2010) and Grondin’s (2011) analyses of contemporary ‘moral panics’ around child sexual abuse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discourses provide necessary frameworks for them to construct and to make sense of their experience in and through their storytelling. Grondin (2011) explains the traits of the post-structuralist narrative in this way:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing these Foucauldian thoughts, poststructuralist scholars have identified a problematic discursive construction underpinning CSA, namely, the binary positioning of adults as powerful and sexually exploitative, and children as sexually innocent and powerless (Angelides 2004;Burman 2003;Clark 2014;Egan and Hawkes 2009;Grondin 2011;Lamb and Plocha 2014). As Angelides (2004) has noted, this discursive positioning has expanded since the 1980s, when feminists fought to overturn the tendency to blame victims of CSA.…”
Section: The Discursive Construction Of Children As Powerless/innocenmentioning
confidence: 99%